SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Summit Technology (BEAM)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1386 16 0 BEAM
Emcee:  Keith Fauci Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
661 The biggest risk factor facing BEAM is not approval for Astigmatism, but the riJohn Binford, Jr.-1/19/1998
660 Spoke with Investor Relations at Summit today and this is the latest news: Q: pappy-1/19/1998
659 What we don't know is whether or not LASIK is scaring away more consumers tJim Mac-1/19/1998
658 Yes, in my post #581 dated 12/23/97, I indicated that I had spoken with I.R. atpappy-1/18/1998
657 Was there a reason you picked Feb. 28th ? Just wondering.Don Hand-1/18/1998
656 Be patient, it will be here by the 28th of February 1998, if not sooner...Pappypappy-1/17/1998
655 It's referred to as DIVERSIFICATION and BEAM isn't the only one lookingpappy-1/17/1998
654 Six months and two days. The FDA panel gave a conditional approval recommendatiDon Hand-1/17/1998
653 There are those who still state that RK is every bit an acceptable procedure, ayosid-1/17/1998
652 "EXCELLENT MANAGEMENT"...? Where'd you get that one? Is Summit&Jim Mac-1/16/1998
651 AJS: Robert Palmisano is aggressively seeking an acquisition candidate and alpappy-1/16/1998
650 Pappy if beam buys another company how do you think it's stock price will bajs-1/16/1998
649 Well, LET"S SEE HOW THEY (BEAM BASHERS-BBs), TURN THIS INTO A NEGATIVE!!!!pappy-1/16/1998
648 So? A lot of people did RK, feeling the risks were within "acceptable parJim Mac-1/16/1998
647 In response to Mr. Mac's statement that there is a suit against LCAV, this pappy-1/15/1998
646 Jim You won't like this. I went to my eye Doc yesterday for my annual checkyosid-1/15/1998
645 What you're forgetting is that LASIK is riskier than PRK. I do know of a LJim Mac-1/15/1998
644 It's not that simple ! "Non-incisional", "Mulit-pass" ajs-1/15/1998
643 You said, "LASIK is highly dependant on the skills of the surgeon..."Jim Mac-1/15/1998
642 No, I'm just concerned that no one seems to care about the risks of LASIK, Jim Mac-1/15/1998
641 i believe the FDA allowed generic minoxidil out before upjohns patent expired. Manny Gugliuzza-1/14/1998
640 Big 2 page write up today in the Detroit Free Press. TLC (The Laser Center) oppappy-1/14/1998
639 As for how long before the patents expire: (1) The last PPP patent expires John Binford, Jr.-1/13/1998
638 Visx does have FDA approval to treat that refraction. Maybe he had it done on John Binford, Jr.-1/13/1998
637 Here's an interesting message on the YAHOO VISX chat board. Appears this ipappy-1/13/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):