SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Nanotech Stocks to Watch
An SI Board Since March 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1411 167 0 NNZ
Emcee:  StockJock-e Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
661Sono-Tek Announces the Release of the MicroMist Stent Coating System Thursday AuRikRichter-8/26/2004
660There has been a rebound from the recent lows in a lot of the nanotechs, looks lStockJock-e-8/26/2004
659My MFIC resistance level of $1.50 was taken out... and easily too! Now at $1.76 StockJock-e-8/26/2004
658Nanotechs on the rebound ... nice gainers today from MFIC, FLML, ALTI, NGEN, NANRikRichter-8/25/2004
657Don't know about "good growth potential"......but you might check Henry J Costanzo-8/25/2004
656You will find most of the good nanotech and MEMs stocks are priced higher than 1StockJock-e-8/25/2004
655Nanotech is looking like it will be huge- Maybe like another internet boom? It Postman-8/25/2004
6549000 shares is probably small change for these guys, but they know investors looStockJock-e-8/24/2004
653I cannot imagine that SOTK can remain at 1.02 bid for too much longer. The storyRikRichter-8/19/2004
6522 insider buys yest. for MFIC by the CEO and General Counsel. Total of 9,000 shRikRichter-8/17/2004
651Today's WSJ reporting that 1,500 companies have nanotech research plans of wRikRichter-8/16/2004
650Trouble is, what's better for the VC's and early stage investors - or ethames_sider-8/13/2004
649Its all about the money. What investors think, and how they act differ during stStockJock-e-8/13/2004
648Business 2.0 seems to think it was a good thing the IPO was pulled... business2thames_sider-8/10/2004
647Even with no profits and no product, I would have taken a shot at it as long as StockJock-e-8/5/2004
646The nanotech sector got more attention with the Nanosys IPO withdrawal then if iRikRichter-8/5/2004
645If anything, I feel the Nanosys IPO would have reignited the sector. The news coStockJock-e-8/5/2004
644I suspect that the cancellation was more related to the fact that the sector hasGlenn Petersen-8/4/2004
643Wow, I didnt think the markets are doing that bad :P , but I guess its bad enougStockJock-e-8/4/2004
642The Nanosys offering has been withdrawn: sec.gov <i>At this time, <b&Glenn Petersen-8/4/2004
641Excellent bullish MFIC interview in the latest Wall Street Transcript of August RikRichter-8/4/2004
640SOTK 1.02/1.10 annual report now available gives corporate highlights: continuedRikRichter-8/3/2004
639Husic Capital Management buys additional MFIC shares: FORM 4 [ ] Check this boxRikRichter-8/2/2004
638Adding JMAR here at 1.50. Stop loss at 1.30.StockJock-e-7/30/2004
637Tiny bubbles? If Nanosys has a successful IPO next week, then get ready for aStockJock-e-7/30/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):