SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Corriente Resources V.CTQ Junior Exploration Co.
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1416 13 0 CTQ
Emcee:  Vincent Ryan Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
666 Ari: I agree with you regarding the significance of the drill holes. These weDan P-4/30/1997
665 The results are not great and alone are probably marginally economical at best.chevalier-4/30/1997
664 Hello Ari, We,ve been here before, bought a bit more today but had to sale someRon Pitts-4/30/1997
663 Casey - Neil Maedel almost always makes a final recommendation after outlining Lorne-4/30/1997
662 If I recall correctly, BHP had to strip 180 meters of overburden at Escondida. Curtis Dennis-4/30/1997
661 I think one critical point in Maedels analysis is "drill intersections begRobert-4/30/1997
660 Bill: This is an excerpt from Maedel's April 28th fax, the section dealingCasey-4/30/1997
659 I'm a bit puzzled about the results. Technically, the market is up-beat aftRobert-4/30/1997
658 Seems like the zone trends shallower as we move south and west. Can't help Curtis Dennis-4/30/1997
657 I couldn't agree with your post's more and that is why I was buying morchevalier-4/30/1997
656 Walter: <<Has anyone heard what Bishop thinks or any others.>> MaCasey-4/30/1997
655 Ari. I think the market did not understand the release. It was actually good neWalter Kalin-4/30/1997
654 Looks like we could be retracing lost ground as CTQ is at $13 and appears at lechevalier-4/30/1997
653 Khanson; If you have 0.5% copper it is worth $13 per tone for the copper. The Bill Jackson-4/29/1997
652 I think you hit the nail on the head. As I understand it holes #5 and #7 were dCurtis Dennis-4/29/1997
651 Thank you Steven, cause my spelling (at 50 yrs. and a grampa) is not likley to Ron Pitts-4/29/1997
650 I remember only too well last fall when the results came out and no one knew whSteven Brates-4/29/1997
649 Morning Robert, Damn if I could just find were I left that cristal ball we coulRon Pitts-4/29/1997
648 Hi Ron, I would like to agree with you, but I am not sure that in this market wRobert-4/29/1997
647 Hi Ari, Your points are will taken and I concur with them, Remember when the fiRon Pitts-4/29/1997
646 Ron, as I look at the results a few thoughts come to mind. I feel that these rchevalier-4/29/1997
645 Ron: You may be right about the market's reaction to the news. Obviously,Dan P-4/29/1997
644 Morning Robert and all. What I see here is Not going to woo the market I expectRon Pitts-4/29/1997
643 So much for the bad news is released on Friday theory. Jamesjames paterson-4/29/1997
642 To All: From my observations of other finds in the past, 1% CU would normaSR.-4/29/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):