SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BMC Software
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1492 34 0 BMCS
Emcee:  Srini Raman Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
667 03/11 09:36 BMC<BMCS.O> says New Dimension will aid share price By Tova General Crude-3/11/1999
666 That's because we love central planning. I must confer with comrade CommissChuzzlewit-3/11/1999
665 Obviously, only a commie would be such a stickler for details. Enterprise resouT-Lo Greens-3/11/1999
664 Laughing.... BTW, all these companies are in the enterprise software arena, buEdwarda-3/11/1999
663 Both you and Chuzz are commies. j/k Anyway, this precipitous drop near the closT-Lo Greens-3/11/1999
662 "Fight" with you, dear Chuzz? I shouldn't dream of being such a Edwarda-3/11/1999
661 Edwarda, I think we are debating a non-issue. I was responding to this questionChuzzlewit-3/11/1999
660 <i>I sure didn't like the spinoff that PSFT did with MMTM. Looks to mEdwarda-3/11/1999
659 My dear Chuzz, it was perfectly clear that you weren't throwing stones at aEdwarda-3/11/1999
658 >>Careful with FORE and CPQ.<< Guess they were cheap for a reason AlienTech-3/10/1999
657 Careful with FORE and CPQ. FORE has horrible asset management problems, and CPQChuzzlewit-3/10/1999
656 >>How're you doing? Judging by current price activity you must have AlienTech-3/10/1999
655 I should have added that when Alien goes long the price of a security is likelyChuzzlewit-3/10/1999
654 Rancher, ideally the approach ought to be independent of the choice of index, bChuzzlewit-3/10/1999
653 >>Finally, the perceived riskiness of a security is also a determinant oAlienTech-3/10/1999
652 Chuzz: You are on the right track, but I might point out the following: PeggiThe Rancher-3/10/1999
651 Edwarda, I wasn't throwing stones at analysts (heaven forbid!). It has beenChuzzlewit-3/10/1999
650 CTC, my dear, you are making one basic horrible mistake in your critique of theEdwarda-3/10/1999
649 Looks like we have a couple (?) shareholder lawsuits brewing here. Regardless oTimeToMakeTheInvs-3/10/1999
648 Good morning Steven, You asked <i>How much weight do you consider this (Chuzzlewit-3/10/1999
647 Possible spillover effect from Morgan Stanley's downgrade of CA from OutperEdwarda-3/10/1999
646 Thanks for the response! An interesting approach. One thing I have been lookiSteven Dopp-3/10/1999
645 Good analysis. BMCS is undervalued relative to the market. At least it appears General Crude-3/9/1999
644 Steven, here is the source of the data. biz.yahoo.com Let me illustrate the aChuzzlewit-3/9/1999
643 Chuz, your modified PEG ratio approach sounds interesting. Where do you get ySteven Dopp-3/9/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):