SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7431 20 0 NPA
Emcee:  Mike Campagna Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6681 Deja vu...........................Carol-9/10/1997
6680 Starlight Star Bright not a Share in Sight With the exception Bradley that wedave herbert-9/10/1997
6679 The recent HALT/SUSPENSION of NPA is similar to sitting the watch in a fox holBradley G. Fraser-9/10/1997
6678 Greetings Kerry I think the large volume of over 800000 in one day brought thedave herbert-9/10/1997
6677 Kerry, please check your mail. Thanks. WayneWayne Allen-9/10/1997
6676 Hello Dave: Do you think that they were alerted by the fact that the huge newsKerry S. Nelson-9/10/1997
6675 Greetings Kerry This to me means that it is a lot worse than inflating a news dave herbert-9/10/1997
6674 Ugghh! Now what does this mean? Do they have what they said they have or not?Kerry S. Nelson-9/10/1997
6673 spoke to soon Northrich Pacific Ventures Inc dave herbert-9/10/1997
6672 Greetings John Well at least they have not suspended it yet possibly they are dave herbert-9/10/1997
6671 Hi Dave, Begins to look that way , a halt of this length usually john mcknight-9/10/1997
6670 Greetings John Well it looks like RH does not have enough to satisfy the vse (dave herbert-9/10/1997
6669 Hi Gian I picked yhat up on Stockhouse but it doesn`t look like it`john mcknight-9/10/1997
6668 Hi John, Agree with you that it would be better to borrow than dijohn mcknight-9/10/1997
6667 Just one thought with the 2 million short John and that is that this money can John Stokes-9/10/1997
6666 John, You may be asleep by now,but someone on the Stockhouse forum seem to havegianelda-9/9/1997
6665 Hi Grant , Small problem with your plan we`re $2million short of bjohn mcknight-9/9/1997
6664 Morning Grant, Sounds good to me. I really don't think that they are justRonald P. Margraf Sr.-9/9/1997
6663 We'll be halted until the VSE say's otherwise.... With nothing else to Grant Movold-9/9/1997
6662 Richard, > Is the company complying with the VSE? Of course they are. ThePeter Moss-9/9/1997
6661 Hi Dave, I see. But let me ask. Are you referring to the clarification side oRonald P. Margraf Sr.-9/9/1997
6660 Evening Hugh, I think that is exactly what happend. Alot of cash went out of Ronald P. Margraf Sr.-9/9/1997
6659 Evening Dave, I agree with you on most points. I have been with this from theRonald P. Margraf Sr.-9/9/1997
6658 Hi John, I know where you are coming from but this is a different type of relRonald P. Margraf Sr.-9/9/1997
6657 Evening Ed, There's nothing mysterious about +++++++++++++++, there plus Ronald P. Margraf Sr.-9/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News