SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CDMA, Qualcomm, [Hong Kong, Korea, LA] THE MARKET TEST!
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1819 28 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Maurice Winn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
669 Jim: I didn't want to get near this board during the "war". ThisMichael Allard-9/5/1996
668 Harvey : Thanks for the info To all: check it out, click on the link that HJim Lurgio-9/5/1996
667 You asked : So won't it be to QCOM's advantage if these huge firms cranJim Lurgio-9/5/1996
666 Great post Jim, thanks. I thought the case had been entirely settled. R. Tajik JF Quinnelly-9/5/1996
665 JF Quinnelly, IDC (IMMC) did not sue QCOM for B-CDMA rights. They bought the pJim Lurgio-9/5/1996
664 TO ALL: I Have been working on CDMA for the past three years (not at QCOM) fromR. Tajik-9/5/1996
663 When I owned IMMC they sucked. I think they may have been primarily TDMA also; JF Quinnelly-9/5/1996
662 <>< Maurice, who is this Ira person? Have a good day Pr. 14:28 ShalomO'Hara-9/4/1996
661 re:Your teledotcom reference Since Bucks County is often considered a suburb oHarvey Rosenkrantz-9/4/1996
660 When you owned IMMC they did not have propritary rights to B-CDMA , but they doJim Lurgio-9/4/1996
659 B-CDMA: that is the technology owned/promoted by Interdigital? I used to own thJF Quinnelly-9/4/1996
658 JF Quinnelly : Please be assured I have read the CMP area you spoke of. This isJim Lurgio-9/4/1996
657 Philip, Thank you. Let the game begin. If I may use this note to respond to MauJim Lurgio-9/4/1996
656 It figures your thread would degenerate into a brawl, Maurice. Now Christine anJF Quinnelly-9/4/1996
655 Maurice, Once again Jim Is Jim. If I could get a bet on that it would be a doubJim Lurgio-9/4/1996
653 "Amen"? Jean, Hang on a minute, How did God get into this! Now that Maurice Winn-9/4/1996
652 Amen!!! JeanJean B. Roper-9/4/1996
651 Well said, Jim. I agree we all now drop the topic and start fresh. I am sure Philip Reinstein-9/4/1996
650 Jack, Thanks for the url: a complete answer to a difficult question. Did youPhilip Reinstein-9/4/1996
649 Jim, you're in good company then. I get pop server rejection at times. SomeMaurice Winn-9/4/1996
648 Maurice You said: The email test Jim was because your designated email didn'Jim Lurgio-9/4/1996
647 Jack, good http, thanks. It would be nice if all these links could be in one plMaurice Winn-9/4/1996
646 Hey!! It's a brawl. Only fitting I guess after so much talking, thinking, dMaurice Winn-9/4/1996
645 Christine, It was not I who fired the first shot , it was your creative writer Jim Lurgio-9/4/1996
643 Jim, I'm finding all of this pretty offensive, also, but it's not MauriGrainne-9/4/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):