SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LRCX this one looks good
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
142 0 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Jim Tao Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
67 They recently lost their head of sales who left when he wasn't promoted to olduser-2/10/1996
66 Covered Calls on LRCX: Diane :I dont know if you have thought about covered cajohn c. cona-2/10/1996
65 to diane and all, my previous message should be qualified that i'm no greatg grovesready-2/10/1996
64 Diane, It is purly my speculation, I think the price drop of LAM today is becaJim Tao-2/10/1996
63 to all, am an investor in lam.the problem could be that the industry for cast g grovesready-2/10/1996
62 Please advise group what should I be doing? I have averaged down my prices of Lolduser-2/9/1996
61 LAM will never go below 22 (book value by year end). Rarely you see companies tAmir Shalit-2/9/1996
60 Augh! When is this bloodletting going to stop? LRCX dropped down to 42 today David Pletcher-2/9/1996
59 Three words: Crave the wave.Ken Peterson-2/8/1996
58 Fascinating that two separate brokerage houses downgraded exactly the same 8 stolduser-2/8/1996
57 To all Lam investors: Lam is on the move. Up 1 1/2 right now. 30% to 40% growtJim Tao-2/8/1996
56 At present time I don't think Lam will down to $38 but if it would I will dJim Tao-2/7/1996
55 Graig, I think you are right. People do react on the downgrade. I don't thiJim Tao-2/7/1996
54 I've been watching LRCX for a good while now. The financials are excellent,Ken Peterson-2/7/1996
53 Bob, I agree. I spoke .... wrote .... too soon. I believe the shares went downCarl Smith-2/7/1996
52 Remember LRCX was only 32-34 about 4 weeks ago. All high tech stocks have greatolduser-2/7/1996
51 Jim....Apparently someone put ther money where Montgomery's mouth was. JustGuinnessGuy-2/7/1996
50 Like predicting the weather!! It amazes me that every day at 4:00 pm ,all the john c. cona-2/7/1996
49 David, Semi equipments have been downgraded by Montgamory. 7 of them: AMAT, LRJim Tao-2/7/1996
48 Bob, There is not a easier way. Making money is hard. Those analysts are prediJim Tao-2/7/1996
47 Urgh, today was not a pretty sight. I watched in fascinated horror as the pricDavid Pletcher-2/7/1996
46 Or we could rename it to "LRCX this one WAS good". No, it's not sBob Zeleznik-2/7/1996
45 Jim, I believe your Stock Talk article should be changed to "LRCX this oneCarl Smith-2/5/1996
44 I think 100 is more of a fair price but the market does not agree with me. As fAmir Shalit-2/5/1996
43 LRCX surged! But at the price around $49, I think it is still undervalued. p/eJim Tao-2/5/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News