SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Religion on SI
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1542 6 0
Emcee:  Don Pueblo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
67 That makes total sense to me. Those are very close to my own thoughts on the suDon Pueblo-8/17/1998
66 <i>This is a private enterprise. He is intentionally disruptive and offenflickerful-8/17/1998
65 To All; I vote against the petition. I agree that Emile is quite offensive inDLL-8/17/1998
64 <i>I believe that it has already been pointed out that everyones "riflickerful-8/17/1998
63 <i>In my opinion, this thread should be deleted, and every other thread sMichelino-8/17/1998
62 Then we go to Laughter thread and work on getting it knocked off, cause many joPROLIFE-8/17/1998
61 I agree - I am opposed to his removal. What is ironic is that extremism like EKeith Monahan-8/17/1998
60 <<My primary intention is simple, Chicken! I desire to reach every heart Chris land-8/17/1998
59 Stop this! If we started a thread to kick off every idiot on SI, there would bIN_GOD_I_TRUST-8/17/1998
58 Agree with the petition. Let SI investigate Emile's blatant violation ofMichelino-8/17/1998
57 Anyone, Unless Emile has blatantly violated the terms of use agreement, I dontmark silvers-8/17/1998
56 I am not making any suggestion here other than to ask SI to review his posts, rJust My Opinion-8/17/1998
55 In favor. I'll even chip in towards the refund. BTW I've been a vegetarSIer formerly known as Joe B.-8/17/1998
54 <i>My primary intention is simple, Chicken! I desire to reach every heartHenry Volquardsen-8/17/1998
53 I personally am in complete disagreement with everything Emile says and believemark silvers-8/17/1998
52 TLC, I oppose having Emile banned. I recognize this is not a free speech issueHenry Volquardsen-8/17/1998
51 You have different rules than the rest of us, since you are a broker. I didn&#Just My Opinion-8/17/1998
50 THE MERE EXISTENCE OF THIS THREAD MUST BE GIVING EMILE NONSTOP ORGASMS!!! One George S. Montgomery-8/17/1998
49 4........it was late. or very early? great, thanks. flickerful-8/17/1998
48 I agreed with the petition, in response #10 ... <I>are we a party of 3?&lLWolf-8/17/1998
47 flick... Good responses. You've got me (re)thinking. BTW thread, the WSJ hDiver-8/17/1998
46 <<If his commentary is disruptive and upsetting to the other patrons, theflickerful-8/17/1998
45 <i>i long ago chose to ignore the virulent vidrine. however....</i>flickerful-8/17/1998
44 <<I am in favor of refunding Emile Vidrine's money and of forbidding flickerful-8/17/1998
43 kerry & anyone else who mistakenly sees this as a "freedom of speech flickerful-8/17/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):