SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Veritas (VRTS)
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
742 72 0 VRTS
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
67 Wow, The Microsoft Scalability show in NY generated not one but four press relBob Burnham-5/20/1997
66 In a perfect world, you might find a clear answer to your question. In this casCzechsinthemail-5/6/1997
65 Does anybody know what is causing the current surge? Up $5 today. Delayed reaBob Burnham-5/5/1997
64 Merger voted on yesterday and complete. New VRTS starting Monday.Edward F. Horst Jr.-4/25/1997
63 One of the most compelling investments in some time and from the looks of this Edward F. Horst Jr.-4/23/1997
62 I have read your previous postings, Ed, and I don't share with your enthusiBobby-4/19/1997
61 Read my previous post to analyze the VRTS/OPVN results and trendline. They willEdward F. Horst Jr.-4/19/1997
60 Yes, it was quite a nice move. I believe this is primarily short covering trigBobby-4/19/1997
59 Nice move the last two sessions. Any thoughts on what next week will bring? AreA. Calcagno-4/18/1997
58 Some factors for projecting valuation in '97-'98: [1] Merger to be compEdward F. Horst Jr.-4/15/1997
57 Sorry I took so long to get back to you. The downgrades I referred to are thisNeil_L-4/13/1997
56 >> If the trend continues, the TA guys will use their Bollinger lines anThe ChrisMeister-4/13/1997
55 I don't agree: consenses still estimates 1.32 for next fiscal year over thAdelantado-4/10/1997
54 I think a possible reason for the decline is that both the quarterly and yearlyNeil_L-4/8/1997
53 Well, the price seems to continue its drop, but not as precipitiously as the laAdelantado-4/7/1997
52 >> I keep switching from the oxygen mask to the scuba tank. << The ChrisMeister-3/22/1997
51 From the general market contraction, you may well be right that the bottom is 1Adelantado-3/19/1997
50 CM, I bought in at 45 several months ago. It went up to 57 and back into the Bob Burnham-3/19/1997
49 Well I was wondering if you were still out there, and if your order to go long The ChrisMeister-3/19/1997
48 <I will remark that itl takes a lot of guts to short this stock at this pricNeil_L-3/18/1997
47 As the bottom is found there are going to be a lot of people taking advantage..Adelantado-3/18/1997
46 I basically agree, and Wall Street has been very intolerant of even a tiny shorThe ChrisMeister-3/5/1997
45 I think you've got a good chance of filling @29. One up day does not a treThe ChrisMeister-3/5/1997
44 I guess that it found its level at around 31; my prediction of 29 was a little Adelantado-3/3/1997
43 This is a great long term play. How many companies can truly function successfTom Markowski-3/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):