Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
7431	20	0	NPA

Emcee: Mike Campagna	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6706	Agreed, and I thought it was retarted to short a stock trading this low, I gues	Hugh M.	-	9/12/1997
6705	Hi Hugh, Haven`t heard anything , but if it is true you and i n	john mcknight	-	9/12/1997
6704	OH SHIT !!! Just heard that the President has/will be resigning, and the VSE wi	Hugh M.	-	9/12/1997
6703	Hi Dave, Looks like once again we`ve been taken , someone used th	john mcknight	-	9/12/1997
6702	JL called: He states that the company should be trading by next week ("we	Dave Atkinson	-	9/12/1997
6701	Here's the post from Stockhouse: <i> Talked to a representative of N	James Berg	-	9/12/1997
6700	Greetings John If this is true it produces more speculation as the only active	dave herbert	-	9/12/1997
6699	Hi John, Seems someone on Stockhouse forum has contacted the compan	john mcknight	-	9/12/1997
6698	Hi Ed, Like Dave I have tried contacting them and will not waste any	john mcknight	-	9/12/1997
6697	Must be time for an AGM or an Audit Dave? The effort to promote this company se	John Stokes	-	9/11/1997
6696	I have tried to call them a number of times. No word yet as they willl not tal	Dave Atkinson	-	9/11/1997
6695	John, Would it not better serve your purpose if YOU contacted them? Telecommu	Ed Stines	-	9/11/1997
6694	Hi Dave and All, Has anyone contacted the company? Re	john mcknight	-	9/11/1997
6693	Afternoon Bradley, This is not a conspiricy theory. All I'm trying to poi	Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	-	9/11/1997
6692	Hi Dave, Reading the release ,gives me real cause for concern , it	john mcknight	-	9/11/1997
6691	Ron writes and writes and writes... <i>Today I will register a complaint	Bradley G. Fraser	-	9/11/1997
6690	Greetings Ray If this meeting took place at 2 pst then its purpose was probabl	dave herbert	-	9/11/1997
6689	Actually Ray, my information was the same. RH DID meet with the VSE and it wa	Ed Stines	-	9/11/1997
6688	To ALL: RH was suppose to have a meeting at the VSE yesterday 2:00 hrs Any new	Ray	-	9/11/1997
6687	P.S. I wouldn't look for the VSE to be in any hurry to unsuspend this sto	Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	-	9/11/1997
6686	TO ALL>>>>>>>>> If I may I would like to give my s	Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	-	9/11/1997
6685	Hi Dave, If you would be so kind to let me run a scenerio past you. First I w	Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	-	9/11/1997
6684	Hi Dave, There was a lot of money fleeing from the stock Fri & Mon. The 8	Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	-	9/11/1997
6683	This looks bad. Is there a big difference between being halted and being suspen	Hugh M.	-	9/11/1997
6682	Greetings Carol Wish it was at 2.20 this time.Hope the wheels are still on th	dave herbert	-	9/10/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):