SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6720<i>If three hundred Representatives all vote in favor of a bill acting undLane3-7/3/2003
6719<i>That's silly.</i> Why is it silly? We have three branches oThe Philosopher-7/3/2003
6718<i> it is still their job to undo legislative stuff that doesn't The Philosopher-7/3/2003
6717testing 1, 2, 3one_less-7/3/2003
6716<i>If the Supremes choose to step in and undo such legislation, they are, Lane3-7/3/2003
6715lol..."tart dissent" <i>"....tart dissent, it follows froone_less-7/3/2003
6714<i> Could the Supremes not put an end to any of that? </i> No lTimF-7/3/2003
6713I don't find any provision in the Constitution that prohibits laws governingThe Philosopher-7/3/2003
6712I love Kinsley. I absolutely love him. Wonder if he'll marry me... AbolisLane3-7/3/2003
6711As I was mall walking this morning, something I haven't done in years, I pasLane3-7/3/2003
6710What if a state legislated bridge rules and said that men had to play with one hLane3-7/3/2003
6709<i>But that doesn't seem to be your argument. You say it's a sociaThe Philosopher-7/3/2003
6708<i> I remember when McDonalds came out with a McLean and no one but me boTimF-7/2/2003
6707See ya...one_less-7/2/2003
6706I gave them $50 once and they send me newsletters from time to time. They did hTimF-7/2/2003
6705:-) I kind of like that. Because I'm a compassionate democratic socialist.epicure-7/2/2003
6704<i>Canada sounds swell, eh? </i>Yeah, except for this nasty socialLane3-7/2/2003
6703I don't get your problem. I understand where Time is coming from. He claimLane3-7/2/2003
6702I agree. Suing people for selling products that people want to buy is ridiculouLane3-7/2/2003
6701Thanks. I've passed the info along.Lane3-7/2/2003
6700I agree with you. There is nothing in the Constitution that grants men the righThe Philosopher-7/2/2003
6699<i>Canada sounds swell, eh?</i> You're welcome to move there ifThe Philosopher-7/1/2003
6698Thanks...average joe-7/1/2003
6697Not to mention the fact that Canada is two shakes away from separating into two average joe-7/1/2003
6696One place that the Candians are behind us is in allowing individual freedom of sThe Philosopher-7/1/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):