SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qwest Communications (Q) (formerly QWST)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6846 129 0 Q
Emcee:  Capitalizer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6721Debt Fears Have Qwest Investors Quaking By James J. Cramer 02/13/2002 14:22 Softechie-2/13/2002
6720If Qwest is such an takeover target. why does the stock continue to slide? With mrnaive-2/13/2002
6719Well lets have a pool for how low it will go. We don't have to worry about tJ. Plesha-2/13/2002
6718more like a smoldering stockmfgrep-2/11/2002
6717It related to a post made by Softechie on another thread I believe. Namaste! JJames Calladine-2/11/2002
6716just because this is such a smoking stock!!mrnaive-2/11/2002
6715where did the weed talk come from? say what??? Jgmfgrep-2/11/2002
6714The song was called: Brother can your spare a dime? By the way, people who smoJames Calladine-2/8/2002
6713Can you spare me couple bucks to buy 1 share?Softechie-2/8/2002
6712TANGIBLE NET WORTH: If you go to my.zacks.com You will see: (as at Dec 31, 2James Calladine-2/8/2002
6711i believe book is $23!!!!!! jasonmfgrep-2/8/2002
6710I think there is still some technical and emotional issues with stocks in generaJ. Plesha-2/7/2002
6709You've hit all the points my friend. That $1.5B in equities offerring ainSoftechie-2/7/2002
6708But why not? Assuming a debt downgrade coming? How screwed up could the compangeoffrey Wren-2/7/2002
6707I wouldn't touch Qwest now...Softechie-2/7/2002
6706Has anyone done an analysis of break up value? Low interest in Q on this board.geoffrey Wren-2/7/2002
6705CONVERTIBLE CORNER: Ongoing Qwest For Rating Stability 07 Feb 08:15 (This aSoftechie-2/7/2002
6704So how low can we go? I love it when sentiment is horrible and everyone is screaJ. Plesha-2/4/2002
6703INTERESTING ARTICLE IN THE DENVER POST denverpost.commrnaive-2/4/2002
6702Yeah, but this is a far different company than the original IPO, as you are wellDavid Lawrence-2/1/2002
6701Bear in mind that this stock went public in June of 1997 at a now split-adjustedSJS-2/1/2002
6700I think Q is counting the beans just fine. with all of the cutbacks etc, they armrnaive-2/1/2002
6699Q isn't cheap at $5 with its current CEO still in place. If the millions throbba67-2/1/2002
6698Qwest is cheap at $5 and I can go for that.Softechie-2/1/2002
6697It's not just the accounting. I think shareholders are starting to see thatrrufff-2/1/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News