SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ATIS is on the move!
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2205 22 0 ATIS
Emcee:  Rick Costantino Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
680 Matt, As I have said, the dermagraft-tc is a minimal product for ATIS, with thMarshall Teitelbaum-3/25/1997
679 At this point Marshall I think these two skin products do not compete. <<Matthew Leo-3/25/1997
678 Matt, It was important to remind people that the d-tc is a temporary covering,Marshall Teitelbaum-3/25/1997
677 Marshall - you made so many points and observations - 1) << IART artificMatthew Leo-3/25/1997
676 Matt, First of all, some of this is comparing apples to oranges. The artificiMarshall Teitelbaum-3/24/1997
675 Correction - Iart artificial skin DOES require refrigeration. It has a 1 yeMatthew Leo-3/24/1997
674 Perhaps the best way to compare is for each of us to inform the other of what wMatthew Leo-3/23/1997
673 Marshall, once again, thanks for the insightful analysis, not only of ATIS, butWWS-3/23/1997
672 Bill, Perhaps, but it also looks like biotech companies in general have had a Marshall Teitelbaum-3/23/1997
671 Matthew, It might be hard to accurately compare them at this time. As far as Marshall Teitelbaum-3/23/1997
670 Bill - If this is what your refering to << and IART with production problMatthew Leo-3/22/1997
669 Weakness in our share price this Thursday and Friday may have been a spillover WWS-3/22/1997
668 Matthew, Not taken as rain, as any feedback is appreciated. HOwever, it is onMarshall Teitelbaum-3/22/1997
667 Dear Matthew, start at the bottom of the thread. techstocks.com BillWWS-3/22/1997
666 This is not intened as rain on your parade. I find it interesting that after rMatthew Leo-3/22/1997
665 Winston, I appreciate the analysis. Can't say I'm all that knowledgeaMarshall Teitelbaum-3/21/1997
664 Rick, I agree about the company in general, preferring to leave it alone and lMarshall Teitelbaum-3/21/1997
663 ATIS has broken down with a failed rally below 14 and an 11.5 trade on Thursdaywinston paris-3/21/1997
662 Marshall, and all, we all need to sit back and forget about this stock until 3QRick Costantino-3/21/1997
661 Marshall, I totally agree with your analysis. For perspective, ATIS was 9+ onJohn M. McCann-3/20/1997
660 Don, Not a problem. I can promise that most who know me see a very large obnoMarshall Teitelbaum-3/20/1997
659 It must be my "TYPE A" personality getting the best of me. I must conDonald Watson, Jr.-3/20/1997
658 Jeffers, Most appeared to know, based on the extremely high volume yesterday. Marshall Teitelbaum-3/20/1997
657 Donald, Take a deep breath. No problem with the company here. The only problMarshall Teitelbaum-3/20/1997
656 Someone better get the news out FAST before we lose our shirt!!!! Regards, DoDonald Watson, Jr.-3/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):