SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Coleville Resources - CLL
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3058 6 0 CLL
Emcee:  Dave Warner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
683 Jeff, The stock speaks for itself...down , down , down. Buy some more, it&#Barry Smith-12/18/1996
682 Barry, If you "knew all along it was a promo", why didn't you shDave Warner-12/18/1996
681 Not Bad, two big fish with such small bait. I knew you'd show up Barry, butJeff Spurrell-12/18/1996
680 Good post John. I wish I had shorted it. I knew all along it was a promo, noBarry Smith-12/18/1996
679 Jeff, I know exactly why CLL is at 1.90. BECAUSE IT WAS ALL A PROMOTION. RerJohn Veltheer-12/18/1996
678 Seems like a lot of shareholders are not taking the "aggressive hold"Jeff Spurrell-12/18/1996
677 Unfortunately the insider data, for stocks on the Calgary exchange is not on thj bell-12/18/1996
676 Not to change the wonderfull subjects of Tonnes, and Bre-x, but does anyone knoAlex Holland-12/17/1996
675 John, apology accepted, although it wasn't necessary. After our previous liStockPro-12/17/1996
674 Richard I owe you an apology, many of the mining companies are now reporting John Stopforth-12/17/1996
673 Coleville IR on Holidays For you people wanting to talk to IR, for the next 3 walias13461-12/17/1996
672 Bre-X group retains high-profile law firm over Busang deal Tuesday, December 1Luc Beaugrand-12/17/1996
671 >There simply is not the clouded title issue with CLL. Bre-X actually >weG Anderson-12/17/1996
670 Don , as far as the brass at Bre-X are concerned they bought the rights to ExlpTim Reddick-12/16/1996
669 Joe, I flatly disagree with an important part of your post... There simply is Donald F. DeKold-12/16/1996
668 C'mon Don! From what I have heard CLL does have a property with developed Joe Bilich-12/15/1996
667 Having looked into it, this is why any rational investor should prefer ColevillDonald F. DeKold-12/15/1996
666 Just wanted to get reply # 666 , it seemed appropriate!Anonymous-12/15/1996
665 interesting article in the Edmonton Journal..today suggested junior mine companj bell-12/14/1996
664 I'm also must confess to lurking on this thread for a while. Just had a coJD-12/14/1996
663 Hello Walter I've been lurking in the background since this thread startedDave Fong-12/14/1996
662 I agree..but by the same token..if cll is only small potatoes,,maybe it will bej bell-12/14/1996
661 Another find like Bre-x, I doubt it. Besides, what company in their right mindRP-12/14/1996
660 Good update on the bre-x situation... Don; To help you understand the bre-x sAndrew Patterson-12/13/1996
659 BRE X theory...true & false Yes Bre X casts a pall over all junior mines inj bell-12/13/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News