QGLY - Funny Name Great Product. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
QGLY - Funny Name Great Product.

An SI Board Since November 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
8960	22	0	QGLY

Emcee: David R. Helms	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6835	Richard Do you know what IMHO means ??? if you do then question answered.	shlama	-	12/8/1997
6834	Shlama Perhaps you can let this thread know where you get your information tha	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6833	Keith, >Qgly now meets the req'ts to be listed on Nasdaq. However, it w	VIPER85730	-	12/8/1997
6832	URI "Richard, go to someone you know, and ask them if they know the	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6831	Roger Are they standing on the offer(Bid) or ask (sell)? Sorry, I didn't l	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6830	best thing you said all year was kill the 5% off the top! where do we go from h	ralph keating	-	12/8/1997
6829	Twombat How "unrealistic" was 15 30 days ago. Granted 8 is unrealist	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6828	Keith I'm certainly glad to hear you realize many people can't be fool	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6827	kinda cheap logic dont you think! come on your smarter than that... ralph B-&g	ralph keating	-	12/8/1997
6826	Valuespec Welcome back to this thread with your unique personalized attacks. I	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6825	Scroll down to the middle of the page, this was supposed to be covered on ABC N	Uri Miller	-	12/8/1997
6824	I don't think it is appropriate to compare QGLY to a penny stock at this st	shlama	-	12/8/1997
6823	The 1st time I used the product, it helped me get over a cold start-to-finish i	Jimbo Cobb	-	12/8/1997
6822	Follow through the Sinclare thread and you will know how a company can drop for	Uri Miller	-	12/8/1997
6821	Richard...Sands recommends Q with a price target of 31 and then stands on the o	rogermci®	-	12/8/1997
6820	Has anyone even figured out why the price decline recently? I think the only w	Ron Kline	-	12/8/1997
6819	Richard, I too am amazed at how easily it dropped through $16. I stopped out	Twombat	-	12/8/1997
6818	richard, Today, a friend of mine reminded me of a few things. 1. Don't	Keith R.	-	12/8/1997
6817	Sands Brothers are another seller of a large block 175,000 shares. They seem to	TE	-	12/8/1997
6816	Richard...Go back on a 1 year chart of Q and you will see 200 DMA is a strong s	rogermci®	-	12/8/1997
6815	When QGLY WAS at $ 8 Richard Miller thought QGLY was going to go down ! When Q	VALUESPEC	-	12/8/1997
6814	Drakes is an admitted short seller. Shortsellers, (I'm not saying Drakes w	Keith R.	-	12/8/1997
6813	Keith: You think I don't have the company's interest at heart? If you	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6812	Alec Actually the MAJOR support level was 16. I'm amazed how easily it dro	Richard Miller	-	12/8/1997
6811	Mgmt is most likely not a wholesale seller of their own stk. The only major se	Keith R.	-	12/8/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):