SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6843 enjoyed you sharing your birdseye view of the televised jackson county tidbit ybearcub-7/20/1999
6842 LOL <b>yaaaaawn</b> Yeah. I'm enjoying myself.C.K. Houston-7/20/1999
6841 not only to you "bleat," well, you format in ASCII extremely well! anbearcub-7/20/1999
6840 Don't tell me I got your goat now, C.K!!! <i>all who can't separbearcub-7/20/1999
6839 oh, and please don't forget: they must do all that sharing <b><i&gbearcub-7/20/1999
6838 <<i>I think we all need to determine here...is this a forum for just rC.K. Houston-7/20/1999
6837 No offense taken!! I just noticed that for months there has been much discusForYourEyesOnly-7/20/1999
6836 <Ron I was civil.but received no answers>Thought I was the only one exasKen-7/20/1999
6835 <should have used a shotgun>Of course,for target practice on the Rons, TGKen-7/20/1999
6834 <<i>all who can't separate sheep from goats NOW will only have wooC.K. Houston-7/20/1999
6833 <<i>Cripes! I should have just used a shotgun...Subtlety is obviously C.K. Houston-7/20/1999
6832 Ron I was civil and specific,but received no answers.Polly's don't likJ.L. Turner-7/20/1999
6831 Cripes! I should have just used a shotgun...Subtlety is obviously lost on someflatsville-7/20/1999
6830 <quit ranting to impress your soulmate, K..k..k.ken> Why are you stutteriKen-7/20/1999
6829 <A vote to retain sarcasm as a response to hubris>Gets my vote! And an awKen-7/20/1999
6828 <<i>Note: Sorry folks... I just couldn't deal with not responding C.K. Houston-7/20/1999
6827 <i>your trotted out, programmed responses have left me unmoved as to yourHawkmoon-7/20/1999
6826 Though I must agree that the "insufferability index" is at an all timflatsville-7/20/1999
6825 thought you were too busy to hang around and do any more than ocassionally contbearcub-7/20/1999
6824 i am as cool and civil as they come. all who can't separate sheep from gobearcub-7/20/1999
6823 A vote to retain sarcasm as a response to hubris, pomposity and a general inabiflatsville-7/20/1999
6822 <<i>Another vote in favor of civility.</i>> Same here. C.K. Houston-7/20/1999
6821 Another vote in favor of civility. Christine Traut-7/20/1999
6820 <i>if his company is so "ready," why in the f**k is he 'deeHawkmoon-7/20/1999
6819 <thanks, ken. the crumbs this guy has dropped> Too funny!Bearcub: You'Ken-7/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):