SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
S1: Doing Business in a Dot Com Depression, -V1
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1013 26 0 SONE
Emcee:  Kevin A. Lynch Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
688 Thanks once again for your thoughts and your approach. JBox-By-The-Riviera™-1/17/2000
687 you might want to look at another of RAJA's stocks - INMG - was a R James IBen Wa-1/17/2000
686 Thanks Joel, <i>what do you do with a company that has great presence, aChuzzlewit-1/17/2000
685 As always.... a masterful analysis. Since forwarding you that report...which BBox-By-The-Riviera™-1/16/2000
684 Wow....thought you had disappeared... There's a new alternative to the yahBox-By-The-Riviera™-1/16/2000
683 Joel, I just got a chance to read the Raymond James equity research piece on SChuzzlewit-1/16/2000
682 What's this? Posts on the S1 thread? No, it can't be. Good to see you Oeconomicus-1/16/2000
681 Hey Kman.... quite a few won't be back is my understanding.... as Krikor Box-By-The-Riviera™-1/13/2000
680 The Yahoo board is dysfunctional again today.... It is a crying shame that I coKevin A. Lynch-1/13/2000
679 Joel, S1 liked by this fund manager: bigtipper.com Cheers, Tuck tuck-12/22/1999
678 Thanks Chuzz... this is a story stock only.... and in its present documented fBox-By-The-Riviera™-12/16/1999
677 Joel, Thanks for your take on the company. Remember, my focus was on the cash Chuzzlewit-12/16/1999
676 Joel, Chuz, Tuck, I'm just sittin on my ever-expanding duff reading some gKing David-12/16/1999
675 correction... at 19x y2003 on 1 billion.... price would be 287Box-By-The-Riviera™-12/16/1999
674 Chuzzlewit... Thanks very much for the time and effort you spent looking at theBox-By-The-Riviera™-12/16/1999
673 Tuck, I am insufficiently versed in the details of SONE to make a realistic caChuzzlewit-12/15/1999
672 Chuzzlewit, From your post Message 12284270 >However, if these trends contuck-12/15/1999
671 Tuck, <i>The trends you are looking at are changing, and apparently for Chuzzlewit-12/15/1999
670 Chuzzlewit, The trends you are looking at are changing, and apparently for thetuck-12/15/1999
669 Joel, here's my preliminary take on SONE based entirely on the most recent Chuzzlewit-12/14/1999
668 > Guru no longer. Hey we can all be wrong once in a while. Actually I'King David-12/14/1999
667 Well, that was quick. Guru no longer. Anybody for a split? Cheers, Tuck tuck-12/14/1999
666 > I think SI is trying to wean me onto NEW SI by messing up Classic SI DittKing David-12/10/1999
665 Excellent article on e-banking's future: cyberatlas.internet.comJPhilipS-12/10/1999
664 possibly tuck......and add that we're subject to the greater market as wellBox-By-The-Riviera™-12/9/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):