Muskox Minerals - MSK on Alberta. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Muskox Minerals - MSK on Alberta.

An SI Board Since November 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
294	10	0

Emcee: John E.Quinn	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
69	Hi Gary. Have you heard if they are drilling yet??? There was a post on SH that	Brumell	-	4/17/2000
68	lking: 1) surface has been flown for over a year. That is how they constructed	Gary Nash	-	4/17/2000
67	1king, good post......I agree that some gravity data could be helpful and woul	teevee	-	4/17/2000
66	Gary, We agree to disagree that is fine! 1) CSAMT is not virtually worthless,	1king	-	4/17/2000
65	Bob: Good input. I was very aware of the NWI input by lking and Krebs. In fact	Gary Nash	-	4/16/2000
64	Thanks Gary. Well put. I'm not an investor in it. Not trying to talk it d	Brumell	-	4/16/2000
63	Brumell: I am NOT promoting MSK, but I certainly am an investor in it as it IS	Gary Nash	-	4/16/2000
62	lKing: Your perspective on CSAMT refutes entirely what MSK has maintained in th	Gary Nash	-	4/16/2000
61	1King- Your analysis of MSK geophysics was great. Looking forward to seeing mor	Bruce Robbins	-	4/15/2000
60	I think you are way off base in your comments to 1king. After NWI, I'd thin	Brumell	-	4/15/2000
59	Gary, "Talk it down" I would never talk down a good junior explorat	1king	-	4/14/2000
58	1King:Expensive? Maybe, and you are sure trying to talk it down. The anomalies	Gary Nash	-	4/14/2000
57	Jack, As per your request. Here are my comments, Some discussion of gravity,	1king	-	4/13/2000
56	Can anyone tell me how far this property is a away from the Rankin Inlet.	winston.s.c	-	4/10/2000
55	Bob: The information is in the Feb 14,2000 long prospectus at sedar.com which y	Gary Nash	-	4/9/2000
54	Point taken, Gary. However, someone and possibly you indicated conductors locat	Brumell	-	4/8/2000
53	Bob: This is an "academic" investigation at this point in time as the	Gary Nash	-	4/8/2000
52	Hi Gary, Like Jack Archer I was viewing Muskox as a hail Mary type play. That w	Brumell	-	4/7/2000
51	Gary: Your perspective is more wholesome than mine. I, from a position of $ sca	3bar	-	4/7/2000
50	Bob: Good to see you on this thread. The next few months will be very interesti	Gary Nash	-	4/3/2000
49	<<< This hail mary investment type play is nerve wracking.>>>	Brumell	-	4/2/2000
48	Welcome to the who wants to be a millionaire mineral play. The smart money ie:	3bar	-	4/2/2000
47	Ignore. Thanks	Dan P	-	4/1/2000
46	Latest from Maedel's on Muskox: He remains very high on it, and I quote: &	Dan P	-	3/31/2000
45	Jack: Cannacord and Yorkton were big buyers. I suspect the core is good as they	Gary Nash	-	3/25/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):