SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ask Vendit Off-Topic Questions
An SI Board Since May 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8752 80 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  Vendit™ Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6927Hi DB, Looks like I was wrong about SGTL, it did not trade back to support at 3Walkingshadow-3/22/2005
6926Hi JTE, Reid is right, the volume in CYTK is too low to make analysis reasonablWalkingshadow-3/22/2005
6925That’s it. Now between you and I and Terry we have a <i>triangulation</Vendit™-3/22/2005
6924I think that I understand .. these three time frames all point toward a supportGersh Avery-3/22/2005
6923Back testing is a test of historical reliability of “something”. In my post linVendit™-3/22/2005
6922Terry, Other than the fact the Greenspan put a fork in the market today I am goVendit™-3/22/2005
6921AMRN will likely see some downside to the 2.25 area where it will consolidate anVendit™-3/22/2005
6920I have no idea what you are trying to tell me. in the 6 month chart you show a Gersh Avery-3/22/2005
6919Thanks T, agree DNDN probably is a good "short term" long down here. JustTradeEm-3/22/2005
6918Thanks Reid, looks like everyone else wanted JOBS at 15, so it may not see my 14JustTradeEm-3/22/2005
6917Sue, You have a great question. The simple answer is that since the lower suppoVendit™-3/22/2005
6916Yes I think that historically the QQQQ has bounced off of the lower Linear RegreVendit™-3/22/2005
6915The chart on the left: ttrader.com Today the upper tine was ~36.75 QQQQ. that Gersh Avery-3/22/2005
6914Sue, If you are long you may want to make a mental stop some point below today’Vendit™-3/22/2005
6913The January lows have now been taken out convincingly, along with the 200 sma. NWalkingshadow-3/22/2005
6912Reid and Terry, so given how we broke through the 36.39 you mentioned in Sunday&Zeddie88-3/22/2005
6911>If you back test in longer time frames you will see some breaches of the 200Gersh Avery-3/22/2005
6910In the chart below you can see numerous times where the 200 EMA is tested and raVendit™-3/22/2005
6909Oil falling has me leaning toward closing out short ... But there's that 20Gersh Avery-3/22/2005
6908Just as I thought....Greenspan: U.S. Stocks Fall on Fed Statement; S&P 500 Vendit™-3/22/2005
6907yep .. EMA was taken out on a close basis three or 4 days ago. Both on spike andGersh Avery-3/22/2005
6906I agree.Vendit™-3/22/2005
6905I have EMA setting but it looks fairly nasty. 139.142.147.218Vendit™-3/22/2005
6904I see that, and the Qs must have hit an electric fence at that point! GreenspanVendit™-3/22/2005
6903MJ, I can remember when MSFT was selling on the OTC for $3.00. There is nothinVendit™-3/22/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News