SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1518 7 0 ACLY
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
693 To all: I've said it before and I'll say it again, this stock holds up Craig Rogers-12/11/1997
692 Yes, I agree Marshall about the migration tools. Absolutely. I thought the mKathy Riley-12/6/1997
691 Marshall, RE: Taxes. ACLY paid reduced taxed this quarter due to a "businCalculatedRisk-12/6/1997
690 I thought calculated missed a couple of points: 1. No tax carry over left. Hands Off-12/6/1997
689 I see your point But it hurts when I could explain in three minutes how to booIVAN1-12/5/1997
688 IVAN: interesting little vignette there about the marketing issue. Mixed responThirdEye-12/5/1997
687 Pancho-I suggest we keep the dialog over here rather than on Roger's threadThirdEye-12/5/1997
686 CR: RE ALCY >>Between these comments (and the poorly prepared PR) my imprPancho Villa-12/5/1997
685 Bill, thanks for the reply. I might as well say that I share some of your conceThirdEye-12/4/1997
684 Taoman, thank you for your response! I didn't intend for my post to be comCalculatedRisk-12/4/1997
683 Taoman: I have been thinking about CRs post also, in terms of the Ford deal. Kathy Riley-12/4/1997
682 Response to CR: Message 2880035ThirdEye-12/4/1997
681 Dear Don, Why flame CR? He is talking his position. He seemed to leave out sKathy Riley-12/4/1997
680 Kathy - Thanks for the info. Compaq may find an opportunity to introduce theiP. Ramamoorthy-12/3/1997
679 I'd elaborate on the silliness of the Cory Johnson article and the company&Don Kelly-12/3/1997
678 <<If it doubles as you hope, it will become a "magnificent short.&quThirdEye-12/3/1997
677 Thanks for the post!! Wonderful to hear the conf. call. Best, IvanIVAN1-12/3/1997
676 Thanks for the post. This stock holds up very well unlike most of the other stoCraig Rogers-12/3/1997
675 From that same article: "In the last 12 months Year 2000 stocks have goneDon Kelly-12/3/1997
674 After close of trading, TheStreet.com's Cory Johnson posted an effusively bJMarcus-12/3/1997
673 Correction!! Boy am I brain dead or what? I own IMRS too and was just on that tCraig Rogers-12/3/1997
672 Kathy: Thanks for the info. I think that IMRS will be a big player in the Y2k aCraig Rogers-12/3/1997
671 Conference Call replay: 800 839-1382 (for six more days). Definitely worth a Kathy Riley-12/3/1997
670 Sorry, I meant to post that to Mukti Samal.nonzeroa-12/3/1997
669 nonzeroa: calm down. That was strictly tongue-in-cheek. eom.ThirdEye-12/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):