SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Don't Ask Rambi
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
71178 76 0
Emcee:  Rambi Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
69978lemmem sweat and deal with it. change has come. atwater at least made no bones wMac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69977I would sugest that a problem lies with the way we use "liberal". For Jacques Chitte11/20/2009
69976dum de dum deee dum de dum....Mac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69975the song... it is Nat King Cole, yes? what is the song they are playing, Koan?Mac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69974Looks like you are going to be as agitated by Obama as I was by Bush. Good, becakoan-1/20/2009
69973Koan - Atwater was a gay man in the closet who did great damage and as he died aMac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69972<I> We liberals have never run campaigns as ugly as the conservatives! &lTimF11/20/2009
69971 <I> Name one liberal Republican senator? </i> Assume there is noTimF11/20/2009
69970>>Atwater was a tough political operative. He wasn't the first, he waskoan-1/20/2009
69969>> She was turned off by the Libertarian Party, but the LP and "liberkoan-1/20/2009
69968Tim - I think we have gotten into something that we should not continue. so be iMac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69967<I> You made a blanket accusation. </i> Excuse me. I did no sucTimF11/20/2009
69966You are not paying attention. You made a blanket accusation that was not worthy Mac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69965<I> beyond 'politics is rough' I could not read. </i> ThTimF11/20/2009
69964beyond 'politics is rough' I could not read. you do know who Atwater wasMac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69963 No he didn't say that. He was being apologetic and gracious. It would haTimF11/20/2009
69962Tim - the point is we don't need tit for that on that. i don't think AtwMac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69961He admitted and apologized for being nasty. And he had been nasty. But that faTimF11/20/2009
69960bull, but believe what you will. Atwater as he died would not have said what youMac Con Ulaidh-1/20/2009
69959 Atwater was a tough political operative. He wasn't the first, he wasn'TimF11/20/2009
69958<I> If libertarians were smart they would drop her </i> She droppTimF11/20/2009
69957 I'm not engaging in revisionist history. Every part of my post was both tTimF11/20/2009
69956LEE ATWATER- a man everyone should know, because of how ugly he was, and the fackoan-1/20/2009
69955Regarding the 1964 Civil Rights act-Come on-lol! Are you engaging in revisionikoan-1/20/2009
69954Impressive. I had no idea.Jacques Chitte-1/20/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News