SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pangea Goldfields T.PGD
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1178 7 0 PGD
Emcee:  Larry Voyer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
703 <<I used 500 k oz it may be 300 or 600k I am hoping the reserves estimateClaude Cormier-12/23/1999
702 Anyone see or hear about this? Looks like someone may bid for Cambior? biz.yasalva-12/23/1999
701 Tim, I may have 'missread' into one of your posts that idea to float mosalva-12/23/1999
700 <<<Re: Takeover discussion ? Barrick will want to see minimum of 1.5Mosalva-12/23/1999
699 Yes, I understand that this is the case. If you go back and look at published dsalva-12/23/1999
698 <<I suppose that the market will improve after the tax related deadlClaude Cormier-12/23/1999
697 The proof of the pudding.... eventually we will all be more winners than we artimbouctou-12/23/1999
696 << think that by increasing the drilling pace in Tulawaka and initiating Claude Cormier-12/23/1999
695 See 682. Tucking option not economically viable. Tulawaka is going to be a sepaimwero-12/23/1999
694 <<But for me and some others-(look at dead activity on PGD since option dClaude Cormier-12/23/1999
693 Small $2M crusher\heap leach Tulawaka investment issue was before PGD drilled bimwero-12/23/1999
692 <<I understand could be as much as 500,000 oz at a cost of only $US45.00 Claude Cormier-12/23/1999
691 RE-read my post - I didn't say they weren't being used in a political cEnigma-12/23/1999
690 Salva there might be confusion somewhere: I never said (or at least never meanttimbouctou-12/23/1999
689 I don't about Mulroney success in the private sector, but Bush's succesTerry Swift-12/23/1999
688 I've no intention of personalising this issue - but you've raised a strEnigma-12/23/1999
687 The point is this - most large public companies have outside directors who are Enigma-12/23/1999
686 If Mulroney and Bush were already on board with Barrick, then I am mistaken. &Terry Swift-12/23/1999
685 D, for the sake of others on this thread, i will debate you one last time here.salva-12/22/1999
684 "We all saw how they brought Mulroney and Bush on board solely for the purEnigma-12/22/1999
683 Sorry Salva you're missing the point here - Pangea may never actually develEnigma-12/22/1999
682 <<<<About six months ago, PGD were considering going ahead with a ssalva-12/22/1999
681 <<I frankly believe that they will come in around $60/oz consideringClaude Cormier-12/22/1999
680 About six months ago, PGD were considering going ahead with a small mill\heap limwero-12/22/1999
679 <<...and now I believe its bigger and CHEAPER than Sutton and PGD is therClaude Cormier-12/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News