SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Berkeley Technology Limited (BLKYY)
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
955 25 0 BKLYY
Emcee:  xcr600 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
705WSJ reported today that INTC made 2.3B by selling shares in companies they ownedAmericanVoter-10/12/2000
704Jim, I do think a buy-back would affect price even in this market, and the comJ. Conley-10/12/2000
703LOL! Well, I hope you don't get any. <g> Best regardsJ. Conley-10/12/2000
702J CONLEY: Nah, let them keep their cash and use it as they normally do. A buy-James Calladine-10/12/2000
701OK, JC - how about this argument: I don't want the company to buy back shareSir Francis Drake-10/12/2000
700Morgan, As I stated, this is not a position I would ordinarily advocate. HoweJ. Conley-10/12/2000
699Dividend was recently paid: US$0.088/ADR (or somesuch), vs. $0.11/share. Why theGeorge the Greek-10/12/2000
698Food for thought: siliconinvestor.com IMHO this price divergence borders on thMadharry-10/12/2000
697JC - good points, though I'm not sure I fully agree with your suggestion on Sir Francis Drake-10/11/2000
696<i> Armin and Pete beat me too it... </i> What? Now I don't knoJ. Conley-10/11/2000
695Armin and Pete beat me too it, but at 14 market cap is less than the private equJ. Conley-10/11/2000
694me too. I think the market cap of its public portolio is around half of what it Madharry-10/11/2000
693My "buy" signal is close to kicking in on tech. Prudential's straBen Wa-10/11/2000
692Wow, I am so lucky--I got to buy LDP both in the 14's AND in the 13's toPete Mason-10/11/2000
6911997, 1998, but now 3 years later and many companies that haven't yet provenoldirtybastard-10/11/2000
690After the falls in 1997 and 1998, I doubt everyone will give up completely. We Dale Baker-10/11/2000
689Dale, the only real problem is that we have *not* seen serious capitulation yet.RockyBalboa-10/11/2000
688Then you will do well, whether it's a 25% Gain or a 50% Gain. ;<) I wasDale Baker-10/11/2000
687Panic level is rising? Not here. Actually I'm very happy that quality stockRockyBalboa-10/11/2000
686The panic level is rising on SI and all around the pundit circuit; quality stockDale Baker-10/11/2000
685A little something on NUFO: Message 14468215Madharry-10/11/2000
684A little more on Agility- redherring.comMadharry-10/11/2000
683Yea the Naz is on it's way to zero. Greatest short ever. Sure wish I played xcr600-10/10/2000
682Got really killed afterhours after popping to 86. $77, I'm riddled. The maRockyBalboa-10/10/2000
681sold some shares at a loss as well... I had intended to trade them hoping for soAmericanVoter-10/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News