SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Don't Ask Rambi
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
71178 76 0
Emcee:  Rambi Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
70953Ignoring the issue of provocation for a minute, are you saying X & jla are eCogito-10/19/2012
70952So "epicure started it" is your defense? And you really don't seeCogito-10/19/2012
70951I saw something offensive in Ilaine's suggestion that there was some kind oBrumar89110/19/2012
70950X's language wasn't mild. And it was part of the first stone being castBrumar89210/19/2012
70949What a ridiculous characterization: "wanting to pull apart corpses, put theBrumar89-10/19/2012
70948Now run along, sonny, before you piss me off. No, I think I'll stick aroundCogito-10/19/2012
70947I have seen in my FB news feed something pop up that I knew was old. It rarely hCogito-10/19/2012
70946I don't see what any of this has to do with justifying your aggressive bullyCogito-10/19/2012
70945Absolutely not little man. I would insult you dead or alive. No hypocrisy on mepicure-10/19/2012
70944No one on this thread wishes ill to "Rambi". Not two years ago and notCogito-10/19/2012
70943I take it you realize you are saying more about yourself than epicure? Your &quoCogito-10/19/2012
70942Why, instead of engaging in an indecorous and unseemly cat fight, using horribleCogito-10/19/2012
70941I must say that if one reads what you guys have written about Epicure, vs. what Cogito-10/19/2012
70940<i>It is tempting to abuse the people we dislike though. I certainly underjlallen510/19/2012
70939Really??? LOL!!.....oh me ...oh my..... Maybe you ought to reserve your commentjlallen510/19/2012
70938I'm not sure there are any terms of use on these boads. Which is why I likeepicure-10/19/2012
70937Nope not gonna happen little manepicure-10/19/2012
70936Your use of the term "lowlife" in regard to someone else is amusing, cCogito-10/19/2012
70935What a load of crap......STFU for a change....jlallen710/19/2012
70934A "sensitive" time when people wanted to pull apart the corpse of someepicure-10/19/2012
70933LOL!!jlallen110/19/2012
70932I understand that you acted like an ass at a sensitve time on this thread.Brumar89610/19/2012
70931You are too clueless to understand this issue, clearly.epicure-10/19/2012
70930Thank you, prince of personal attacks (and apparently grudges- though since I caepicure-10/19/2012
70929I didn't see any personal information of hers on the thread, yet you showed Brumar89110/19/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News