SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Don't Ask Rambi
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
71178 76 0
Emcee:  Rambi Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
70978It's nice you came here to defend your friend and end up saying ok, she breeBrumar89-10/20/2012
70977Wow, I guess I should have been more afraid. That really hurt. ;-)Cogito210/20/2012
70976GFY, douchebagjlallen210/20/2012
70975LOL!!! Now that's a hoot.....!!!jlallen210/20/2012
70974Well if you know about the friending thing, then you know you can't see anytepicure-10/19/2012
70973Hardly. Only to you (and your ilk friends), because you that's what you wanepicure-10/19/2012
70972Nah, it's not really so restricted. I know about the friending thing and I Brumar89-10/19/2012
70971Ah, you're admitting X breeched civility. And of course, you're not admCogito110/19/2012
70970I'm a tit for tat person myself. But I see you going far beyond that. It&#Brumar89-10/19/2012
70969Facebook IS restricted. You get to pick who your friends are. You set levels epicure-10/19/2012
70968I'm saying I don't go nuclear until provoked, but I am not peacenik. Ifepicure-10/19/2012
70967Whatever ... no one here was posting restricted personal information about anyonBrumar89210/19/2012
70966Ah, you're admitting X breeched civility. That's a start. You're rBrumar89-10/19/2012
70965And I have. The truth is, some people get so excited providing tidbits of gossiepicure-10/19/2012
70964You don't seem to have understood my post at all. I saw very mild breeches Cogito-10/19/2012
70963You're saying it took a series of posts for you to go nasty ... okay.Brumar89-10/19/2012
70962We must see it differently about who did that.Brumar89-10/19/2012
70961I don't have to ask. You'll show the truth.Brumar89-10/19/2012
70960felt sorry for her children Guess I missed that comment. But seriously, who haBrumar89-10/19/2012
709591st post- hardly provocative... Message 28471710 I don't think even the seepicure-10/19/2012
70958"I'm not drawing any kind of eqivalency between the two people. Not in Brumar89-10/19/2012
70957I'm not oblivious to that, either. Nor am I oblivious to who escalates the Cogito-10/19/2012
70956that's the way I see it It's no big surprise you'd see it differentepicure-10/19/2012
70955OK, I'm not objective. I'm also not oblivious of who starts a fight.Brumar89-10/19/2012
70954Ilaine clearly implied that she thought epicure was an abuser when she said she Cogito-10/19/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News