SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ONXX
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
810 61 0 ONXX
Emcee:  (no name provided) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
710The tide has turned...the downgrades are still the bain of this stock...the moutSkywatcher-5/17/2001
709That's the reason we are falling so hard from the 11's.... the good neSkywatcher-5/14/2001
708Blockade of Raf Kinase May Be Nontoxic Way to Halt Tumor Growth ---------------Miljenko Zuanic-4/26/2001
707Miljenko, You have a long memory. Thanks. Cheers, Tucktuck-3/26/2001
706Message 14852036 Initial PI results didn't reach criteria to take position Miljenko Zuanic-3/26/2001
705OT "worth owning" It's always a matter of how much you have to pscaram(o)uche-11/28/2000
704OT Only if it's as good as they say and worth owning. ThanksElmer-11/28/2000
703OT Sure, a bit. Known for being "the Cleveland company" or for "scaram(o)uche-11/28/2000
702OT The October 30, 2000 issue of Red Herring has a piece on a proteomics companyElmer-11/28/2000
701I will not buy ONXX based on 1042. However, PFE seams to see value in this technMiljenko Zuanic-11/20/2000
700MZ, You still watching this one? Interesting presentation news this morning: tuck-11/20/2000
699Almost everything I own is getting slammed. ONXX might as well join the others.Charles Tutt-10/12/2000
698Charles, I'm afraid you're even less happy today. Secondary prices at $Tom Hua-10/12/2000
697I don't know. I'm not very happy about today's action. Charles TutCharles Tutt-10/12/2000
696So, Charles, Now that some time has gone by, do you ONXX retracing back to 14? Paul Kern-10/11/2000
695FWIW, tfc.com Cheers, Tucktuck-10/4/2000
694eurekalert.org UCSF finding suggests mechanism of experimental cancer drug, hintjohnsto1-10/2/2000
693Trader's Edge: Onxx Pharmaceuticals 29-Sep-00 00:03 ET [BRIEFING.COM - Robejohnsto1-10/2/2000
692Richard, thank you for reiterating your contradiction. Good luck to you as well.Mama Bear-9/26/2000
691I have no opinion of whether the share price is headed north or south. Period. scaram(o)uche-9/26/2000
690Just for the record, I'm out of ONXX at 24, there may be more there but I hatom pope-9/26/2000
689Richard, it's a contradiction to anyone who has a grasp of communicating in Mama Bear-9/26/2000
688>> First you say you have no opinion, then you say it's a silly short.scaram(o)uche-9/26/2000
687Richard, you have your opinion, and I have mine. I must say I've never quiteMama Bear-9/26/2000
686Strong close on double normal volume in breakout of recent range bodes well fromgeotrader-9/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News