SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ask Jeeves,Inc-(Nasdaq-ASKJ)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
838 20 0 ASKJ
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
713<b>RRUFF, THERE WHERE ONLY 41,000 SHARES SHORT AS I HAD SHOWED YOU. YOU KEStockDung-2/28/2003
712Your friends are getting their heads handed to them in ASKJ. I've been on vrrufff-2/28/2003
711<b>DON, WHY DOES IT DISTURB YOU SO? DOES BIG BOLD BLACK TYPE HARM YOU IN SStockDung-2/28/2003
710<B>Although it is under fire, short-selling should be encouraged. InvestorStockDung-2/28/2003
709He likes to shout. It's a sign of intelligence.rrufff-2/28/2003
708TS Why do you feel the need to so often post using bold type?Don Green-2/28/2003
707<B>rruff, those are the “toxic” or “death spiral” convertible“ short selleStockDung-2/28/2003
706Wow are there really crooked shorts? Naked Short Seller Controversy SEC, Courtrrufff-2/28/2003
705<B>Goldman Halts Coverage of AOL, Disney; Fires Analysts (Update2) By StepStockDung-2/27/2003
704<B>SEC's IPO probe expands to Morgan Stanley-WSJ Reuters, 02.26.03, 6:StockDung-2/26/2003
703Time to give you another break. Off skiing and had left some absurd orders in. rrufff-2/22/2003
702Dot-coms' reemergence Focus on profitability boosts many decimated stocks rrufff-2/21/2003
701It's nice to have an academic with a cool head here.rrufff-2/20/2003
700it's academic dude..10K a day-2/20/2003
699If you paid a dollar and it goes to seven, wouldnt that be a six bagger?StockDung-2/20/2003
698While we're waiting for you to come up with something new, it's officialrrufff-2/20/2003
697I think you are lost in the 1999 bubble burst to the point of being obsolete. Trrufff-2/20/2003
696To be objective I would have to see the SEC filings where ASKJ's touted thosStockDung-2/20/2003
695Don't you remember? You've been bashing since under $1? U have to learrrufff-2/20/2003
694FUNNY, I THOUGHT $196 WAS THE OLD HIGH. SILLY ME.StockDung-2/20/2003
693ASKJ - new high finance.yahoo.com Why did I only buy back 1/4 on dips? What trrufff-2/20/2003
692i'm shocked. absoludley SHOCKED Lol10K a day-2/19/2003
691<b>"Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, a lawyer for the underwriters, which includeStockDung-2/19/2003
690lol10K a day-2/19/2003
689<b>Goldman, Salomon lose bid to dismiss IPO suits By Jake Keaveny and GaiStockDung-2/19/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):