SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
QGLY - Funny Name Great Product.
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8960 22 0 QGLY
Emcee:  David R. Helms Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7185 >>wait'll you see the companies that will take a serious "Year 2R. M. Rosenthal-1/12/1998
7184 SB-2 Update I just received a callback from Karen Goldman at InFocus and accorBill Fischofer-1/12/1998
7183 My wife brought home the Feb. edition of McCalls Magazine. There is a series ofSly_-1/12/1998
7182 Thanks for the responses. It seems the general consensus is that the worst hasColby-1/12/1998
7181 understand they have to be covered by jan 31 and can't be repurchased for 6vince heileson-1/11/1998
7180 Wonder when the short positions have to be covered? GaryGary Clarke-1/10/1998
7179 wrt short position, here is Q's December short position: 12/97 582,095 shaayn rand-1/10/1998
7178 Colby, IMO, The market already turned. Just nobody told us. Q didn'tVIPER85730-1/9/1998
7177 There are quite a few "short shares" to be handled. When is the day Gary Clarke-1/9/1998
7176 Colby- "Combine that with continued earning alerts and the possibility foTodd D. Wiener-1/9/1998
7175 Went past the trade missions of Britain, Ireland, France and Brazil here in NEWArris-1/9/1998
7174 To all, I am curious as to what people think of the overall market condition.Colby-1/9/1998
7173 Frank, >>Very cyclical, very predictable<< I don't think any VIPER85730-1/9/1998
7172 I don't think it really has anything to do with the stock. Look at the marFrank Perlmutter-1/9/1998
7171 <i><b>Isn't all of this starting to sound just a little bit silSly_-1/9/1998
7170 Drake: <i>No need to remind me that I was WRONG-O on the big Quig</i&John A Satriano-1/9/1998
7169valuespec.comVALUESPEC-1/9/1998
7168 John: No need to remind me that I was WRONG-O on the big Quig. I've got tdrakes353-1/9/1998
7167 Drake: <i>FWIW, I have not had a short position in QGLY since late AugusJohn A Satriano-1/9/1998
7166 drakes, thanks for the info however, why arnt you in?<eom>ralph keating-1/9/1998
7165 Let's not lose sight of what Guy is saying. The 20% growth is based exclusWill Preska-1/9/1998
7164 Ralph: For all I know 20% sales growth was what the analysts were estimating fdrakes353-1/9/1998
7163 with this latest news not really moveing this stock like one would think on a bralph keating-1/9/1998
7162 Ralph: As far as I know anyone can short this baby. I use a discounter and hadrakes353-1/9/1998
7161 DRAKES, been here since dec 96, with the dark cloud of the sb-2 hanging over ouralph keating-1/9/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News