SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CICI - Communication Intelligence, handwriting recognition
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1025 11 0 CICI
Emcee:  Glinda Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
725 what nonsense what is the idea of posting real facts on this board, no one wanmfamily-4/28/1999
724 I won't disagree with the last posters explanation. Either way, I see pricAT7-4/26/1999
723 Re: << The numbers given were for the entire market.>> A final woCharles Skeen-4/26/1999
722 AT7 & ALL: Well Ithink that things are going very well from what I can gJohn M Connolly-4/26/1999
721 To: Hold The Mayo, I agree with you. I have not had a chance to call CICI yet,AT7-4/24/1999
720 My original statement stands. Ben Wa-4/24/1999
719 As I stated earlier, I was at the meeting on the 20th. The numbers shown were AT7-4/23/1999
718 Hold de Mayo: Here is a post from the Yahoo thread by someone who differs fJohn M Connolly-4/23/1999
717 regarding potential revenue numbers as stated on Yahoo and reposted here - I spBen Wa-4/23/1999
716 To Leedm: I also am a long term, and optimistic, holder of CICI. You mentioRob Tap-4/23/1999
715 I was also at the meeting. The numbers were presented by product by year for tAT7-4/22/1999
714 John, Yes, those were the numbers they quoted. There is a lot of up-side poLeedm-4/22/1999
713 Leedm: I saw another note on a different board - with approximately the sameJohn M Connolly-4/22/1999
712 John, If I remember correctly, they estimated their 'total' revenue Leedm-4/22/1999
711 Leedm: A question -Did they really talk about revenue figures of 175M this yJohn M Connolly-4/22/1999
710 Wafa & John, I was at the meeting Tuesday. It seems that there were seveLeedm-4/22/1999
709 Wafa: Yes - that news came out this morning. If they do have that much potenJohn M Connolly-4/21/1999
708 Well, take a look at what I just found; Communication Intelligence, VeriSign InWafa SHIHABI-4/21/1999
707 CICI, would finally be going for the gold! Wafa SHIHABI-4/21/1999
706 WAFA: No as I was not at the meeting. The person who was at the meeting hasJohn M Connolly-4/21/1999
705 John, can u confirm these numbers from anywhere else? Such numbers would make tWafa SHIHABI-4/21/1999
704 Wafa &ALL: There is a report on the Yahoo thread by someone who was at tJohn M Connolly-4/21/1999
703 Yes, but look at the volume spike. Healthy. Wafa SHIHABI-4/20/1999
702 I guess that in today's market, it didn't make any difference what the Aubrey B. Calvin-4/19/1999
701 We have news marketwatch.newsalert.com it is the Ericson deal . JohnJohn M Connolly-4/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News