SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7252 It was NITE the whole time. I was mad at Brown for the way they were handling Deeber-2/16/2000
7251 Deeber, Heck I thought it was all Brown and Co.'s fault. Now you are mad aBWAC-2/16/2000
7250 It may...I would feel better if the Unibomber got them though... :) Deeber-2/16/2000
7249 now this is just an idea .... but well wholly moly deeber .... get back at thSusan Saline-2/16/2000
7248 I came to to show how NITE screws people. I guess its good for NITE stock becuDeeber-2/16/2000
7247 blank, given today's run in light of a weak "financials" sector, gbh-2/16/2000
7246 gary, keep feeding them the rumors:-)blankmind-2/16/2000
7245 How's this for sheer, unadultered, utter Wall Street nonsense. theflyonthegbh-2/16/2000
7244 Susan, NITE IMO has the potential to double by year end. JakeStraw-2/16/2000
7243 OFF topic and on .... ah ... I see ... well I wouldn't be avging down JakeSusan Saline-2/16/2000
7242 ******* OFF TOPIC ******* Susan, I asked you those questions because if you alJakeStraw-2/16/2000
7241 ALLP<--news says magic words--" Phase 3 "Anthony@Pacific-2/16/2000
7240 ******* OFF TOPIC ******* was brousing SI and caught your thread I own the otSusan Saline-2/16/2000
7239 ******* OFF TOPIC ******* Susan, 2 questions: One do you currently own any T &JakeStraw-2/16/2000
7238 OT what think T ? is it done falling ... is it done going sideways? Is it readySusan Saline-2/16/2000
7237 blank, LOL. I always appreciate your dry sense of humor. <eom>gbh-2/16/2000
7236 blankmind, IMO no apology is necessary for someone's obvious ignorance! JakeStraw-2/16/2000
7235 It's the cost of doing business. Everyone has to make a little $$$$. General Crude-2/16/2000
7234 let me get this correct: 1. you come onto the nite thread attempting to get peblankmind-2/16/2000
7233 "CIBC increased their 2000 estimates from 1.75 to 2.35. Also in their noHerschel Rubin-2/16/2000
7232 <at the expense of the many and the dumb> But isn't just about the wBWAC-2/16/2000
7231 baloney the system is set up for the few and the priveledge at the expense of tAnthony@Pacific-2/16/2000
7230 Tis a pity. CubeCube-2/16/2000
7229 Jeez....doesn't anyone get the damn point of this post?? NITE is not filliDeeber-2/16/2000
7228 <i>so I ask is it fair that market makers have advantages over the publicgbh-2/16/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News