SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc.
An SI Board Since March 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3027 64 0 MNTA
Emcee:  michael_f_murphy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
727<i>if the FDA finds that its only biological activity is on Factor Xa/IIa&Biomaven-2/25/2007
726Well said.keokalani'nui-2/25/2007
725I do not buy the Bear Stearns argument that Lovenox need not be characterized ifDewDiligence_on_SI-2/25/2007
724Jeez. If I made 50% on all my trades I'd own Oahu. My father- in-law preachelarrytioga-2/24/2007
723You want dumb? I bought at 4 and sold at something like 6 or 7.scaram(o)uche-2/24/2007
722Smart, dumb.......such is the life of a biotech investor! :-)The Dodgy Ticker-2/24/2007
721I remember telling a cyber friend that $12 a share was a steal for SEPR back whetom pope-2/24/2007
720Sorry, I should have been clearer. What I was saying is that the stock is at $12Formerpro-2/24/2007
719"I did not expect SEPR to go from 130 to 5 either. :-)" It was 3.90 aRocky9-2/24/2007
718Me too. I did not expect SEPR to go from 130 to 5 either. :-) ijIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-2/24/2007
717I'd be interested in how you come up with $12 as a downside risk. Hope you&Tomato-2/24/2007
716If you happened to have the Bear Stearns report, could you please post and shareejgopher-2/24/2007
715You can rule out explanation #1 (NVS selling).DewDiligence_on_SI-2/24/2007
714I have been here for some time and kept silent (shy fingers). It is nice to readFormerpro-2/24/2007
713Do you mean the "transparency" that S.E.C. prick Cox and president busscaram(o)uche-2/24/2007
712Any way we can get real time data, see what major share holders are left? What Go Market Go!-2/24/2007
711Unfortunately I think Ian is right in that, the news writers interpret the eventIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-2/24/2007
710I wonder how many people actually did not know what they were buying and why andRobohogs-2/24/2007
709Jon, 1. Court ruling handed down. 2. Stock price melted down. 3. Thus RulinIan@SI-2/23/2007
708Did I miss something? Do folks thing it would have been better for SNY to win? Robohogs-2/23/2007
707It’s silly when a sell-side analyst bashes a stock and then assigns what is esseDewDiligence_on_SI-2/23/2007
706Especially when a peer doesn't come readily to mind.tom pope-2/23/2007
705UPGRADES & DOWNGRADES HISTORY Date Research Firm Action From To 23-Feb-0Arthur Radley-2/23/2007
704Bear piece had me ready to sell my stake given its spin - i.e., clearly a short Robohogs-2/23/2007
703I noticed. Seems to me the selloff may have run out of steam and I started addiIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-2/21/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News