SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7280Clearly, you've done a lot of research on this. But...but....zzzzzzzzzzzz OE-2/21/2004
7279What compels you to watch Triumph of the Will from time to time?Tom Clarke-2/21/2004
7278Come on Laz, that's a red herring. Do you really think Gibson's intentioTom Clarke-2/21/2004
7277Clearly, some explanation is needed on the differences between the various TradiTom Clarke-2/21/2004
7276I see I put quotes around it but neglected to provide the link. <i>... &E-2/21/2004
7275<i>Gibson is part of the Traditionalist Catholic Church</i> There iTom Clarke-2/21/2004
7274I read somewhere that John is a possible eyewitness. Of course, he would have beTom Clarke-2/21/2004
7273This was also a cultural phenomenon: ihffilm.com I will scold E for pestering hLazarus_Long-2/21/2004
7272<i> I do think the movie is a fascinating cultural development, and it wilThe Philosopher-2/21/2004
7271<i>But I do think the movie is a fascinating cultural development</i>E-2/21/2004
7270In the Gospel of John, they are portrayed as worrying that Jesus will cause a ciNeocon-2/21/2004
7269<i>the Sadducees had bought a crowd</i> Really? That would explain Tom Clarke-2/21/2004
7268Just went back and glanced at the Chronicles magazine article and realized that Tom Clarke-2/21/2004
7267The implication in the Gospels was that the Sadducees had bought a crowd, as it Neocon-2/21/2004
7266<i>missing the argument.</i> No argument to miss. Just an enlighteThe Philosopher-2/20/2004
7265Good post. My brother in law, who is Jewish, and I have been communicating aboThe Philosopher-2/20/2004
7264What what do you draw from that? Clearly, she thinks they're inherently antiE-2/20/2004
7263I don't understand it either. Just the week before, people from that same toTom Clarke-2/20/2004
7262I see Ms. Fredriksen is making the rounds of the talk shows, sounding the alarm.Tom Clarke-2/20/2004
7261Research on that movie is not very impressive. This is an interesting piece by tE-2/20/2004
7260The primary converts to Christianity before the rise of the Pauline Apostolate wNeocon-2/20/2004
7259MEL GIBSON: FIGHTING AND WINNING THE CULTURE WAR by Tom Piatak MEL GIBSON’s TheTom Clarke-2/20/2004
7258Not having seen the film, I cannot say that Foxman's anxiety is baseless. HoNeocon-2/20/2004
7257Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), met with TimF-2/19/2004
7256And in addition to quantum mechanics there is always chaos theory. "The veTimF-2/19/2004
7255Of course.Neocon-2/19/2004
7254Well, one of us is wrong. I'll agree with that.The Philosopher-2/19/2004
7253OK. Your are wrong, but that is your prerogative. Take it easy........Neocon-2/19/2004
7252<i> But that doesn't change my point. Science makes certain assumptioTimF-2/19/2004
7251I get your point, but I don't agree with it. I think you're playing meaThe Philosopher-2/19/2004
7250Again, you are not getting the philosophical point. Insofar as the world we expeNeocon-2/19/2004
7249If that's your point, then I understand it but don't agree that it is coThe Philosopher-2/19/2004
7248Again, you are not getting the philosophical point, which is that the scientificNeocon-2/19/2004
7247All proof depends on assumptions and postultates. You can't have a proof wiThe Philosopher-2/19/2004
7246That is the point. Kant assumes that there will be a comprehensive causal explanNeocon-2/19/2004
7245<i> and Kantianism, where the world of appearance is subsumed under strictThe Philosopher-2/18/2004
7244I do not think that is true, generally. Protestants, for example, are well- knowNeocon-2/17/2004
7243Not quite right. There are three possible solutions: one, panpsychism, were therNeocon-2/17/2004
7242<i>"For example, part of the process of assimilation in the United Stone_less-2/16/2004
7241Barzun, in "From Dawn to Decadence" (highly recommended) said somethinThe Philosopher-2/15/2004
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News