SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ProNetLink..(PNLK)
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8242 9 0 PNLK
Emcee:  ilh1 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7292 Nice vote of confidence to not need to sell shares to keep the company in businFlatTaxMan-6/24/1998
7291 Looks like a close at 2.56 on 664K shares! Nice day! -acAshley Campbell-6/24/1998
7290 last trade 16:00 bid: 2.53 ask: 2.54 + .70 I am going for a swim, got to cool dWarren A. Wilbur, Jr.-6/24/1998
7289 Looks as if somebody with deep pockets with a venture capitalist attitude is taRudy-6/24/1998
7288 2.5 RT! -acAshley Campbell-6/24/1998
7287 A promise by management not to sell restricted shares and thus cause their own LT-6/24/1998
7286 RTQ 2.34 / 2.35 +.51 Warren A. Wilbur, Jr.-6/24/1998
7285 No chance on earth that sign ups are strong to a marginally functioning serviceJester-6/24/1998
7284 Mark, I Had been long PNLK too. 4 - 8 - 4 roundtrip! I was criticized before Rudy-6/24/1998
7283 Ashley, it's more like 25% by now...<G>, stock is looking very strongWarren A. Wilbur, Jr.-6/24/1998
7282 Thanks Mark! I'd hate to see this thread turn nasty again... I'm aAshley Campbell-6/24/1998
7281 How about fraud! For a company to publish a press release which investors relyLucky Lady-6/24/1998
7280 I suspect the dates were just an oversight. I also suspect that the general assSeal-6/24/1998
7279 OT Rudy, please don't be hostile with Ashley. She's been long PNLK as lMark Duper-6/24/1998
7278 Stop the BS! What 20% profit are you talking about? Those are legitimate quesRudy-6/24/1998
7277 Because there's just no pleasing some people... Some people aren't satAshley Campbell-6/24/1998
7276 I don't comment too often on SI, but I do have some shares of PNLK, so I waGENO-6/24/1998
7275 Rudy, remember it's VOLUNTARY which means, they did not HAVE to do it, so wWarren A. Wilbur, Jr.-6/24/1998
7274 Hey, did I use the term "scam" at all? You did! I am just asking thRudy-6/24/1998
7273 Look folks I think we all know, how risky these OTCBB stocks are you do your Paganini-6/24/1998
7272 this is extra good news to me. i am a small fry who has watched the stock tankpete2-6/24/1998
7271 One more question remains: How binding, legally, is such an agreement? Rudy-6/24/1998
7270 Mr. Mayor, THIS IS GREAT NEWS! I asked them to do this. Their restrictions werLucky Lady-6/24/1998
7269 Thank you Warren. It is a good sign of confidence. eom. Rudy-6/24/1998
7268 Glen, I hope they have the stock certificates in a safe somewhere, can't trWarren A. Wilbur, Jr.-6/24/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):