SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Organogenesis ORG
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1223 7 0 ORG
Emcee:  Rick Strange Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
73 Dear Jane, The ORG website is organogenesis.com. The ORG board that I spoke of Paul Shield-4/18/1997
72 Dear Paul where is the ORG board. Could you please give me the URL for it. By tJane Shea-4/18/1997
71 Paul, Not meaning to be disagreeable at all. As a matter of fact, I enjoy theMarshall Teitelbaum-4/17/1997
70 Marshall, Re: "I have to disagree with you on two of your points". ArPaul Shield-4/17/1997
69 Dear Jane, It has been nice see your posts. I actually have been in ORG for so Paul Shield-4/17/1997
68 Bernard yes it is a true 5 for 4 split (called a 25% stock dividend). It is notPaul Shield-4/17/1997
67 Is it a true 5 for 4 stock split ? And is the company helping short sellers?Bernard I. Gentile-4/17/1997
66 Dear Paul: Its nice to hear from someone positive on the prospects of ORG, I Jane Shea-4/15/1997
65 Paul, I have to disagree with you on two of your points, although they are allMarshall Teitelbaum-4/14/1997
64 So what do we have? 1) Canadian approval -- insignificant by itself but their aPaul Shield-4/14/1997
63 Jane, Not meaning to imply that my info is from any particular inside source. Marshall Teitelbaum-4/9/1997
62 Dear Teflon: I did not know the Bass family had a interest in ORG where did yJane Shea-4/9/1997
61 Dear Jane: I have no EVIDENCE that the FDA approval is a slam dunk, I am merelyTeflon-4/9/1997
60 Thanks for the input Marshall, by the way have you spoken to anyone on ORG and Jane Shea-4/9/1997
59 Jane, Excellent point you make. Although it was indeed very good news for ORGMarshall Teitelbaum-4/8/1997
58 Dear Teflon: Why do you think it is a slam dunk, the FDA is extremely independeJane Shea-4/8/1997
57 Dear Rick: This issue re: Cryopreserved tissue had come up a long time ago, wheJane Shea-4/8/1997
56 By any means, the Canadian approval goes a long way towards pushing the US FDA Teflon-4/8/1997
55 Jane, I never said that Canadian regulatory review of drugs or medical devicesRick Strange-4/7/1997
54 Dear AE and Rick: This Canadian approval is a signicant milestone for ORG. CaJane Shea-4/7/1997
53 A.E. For any company to get approval anywhere is a positive. I have no idea Rick Strange-4/7/1997
52 Rick's opinion is what Sturza says it is!!!andy harrison-4/7/1997
51 Rick, I'm neqw to this thread. I've been following ORG for some time(I A. E.-4/7/1997
50 Correction to quote in prior post. The following quote differs from my prior pRick Strange-4/5/1997
49 David, I covered my short Thur. I had been short the stock quite some time. I Rick Strange-4/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News