SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
GIFS
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
8012 20 0
Emcee:  Yuri Aminov Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7312 No doubt. KenKen Todd-3/2/1998
7311 Funny you should mention them trying to buy gifs. Some papers I got from the Stbuzzlite-3/2/1998
7310 The only "books" that Silverman's father reviewed were those founKen Todd-3/2/1998
7309 Ken Can you fill in some of the gaps between "Mr. Smart Investor" anDan Hughes-3/2/1998
7308 "...there was an accountant from Beachwood, Ohio who prepared some sort ofKen Todd-3/1/1998
7307 The attorney from Ohio was Jack Quarrant. He never did much for GIFS because MKen Todd-3/1/1998
7306 CB-- I am not calling Mark a criminal. I indicated earlier that I felt he was James T. Millican II-3/1/1998
7305 Thanks, Caroline. It is good to know that people like you are in this world; tKen Todd-3/1/1998
7304 Agreed. This mixing of victim and criminal doesn't sit well with me. CBCaroline-3/1/1998
7303 Why, after all this time, would anyone try to make Mark an issue in this mess? buzzlite-3/1/1998
7302 <i>I say this opinion - not from a legal point - but a moral one.</i&gCaroline-2/28/1998
7301 I ran through all of my correspondence from GIFS and I found several like that Mark Rutheiser-2/28/1998
7300 Welcome home, Ken. Glad you're OK. Seems a bit too easy to pick on someoneCaroline-2/28/1998
7299 I could never figure out what Rehtorik always wanted to talk to you about, thatKen Todd-2/28/1998
7298 To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure what I would have done; however, Mark James T. Millican II-2/28/1998
7297 Ken, you said, <i> "When you see close associates of Mo and Mike murCharles A. King-2/28/1998
7296 Ditto that. My recollection is the same, and I don't hold Mark responsible buzzlite-2/28/1998
7295 Caroline I can answer your question to James from my perspective, probably havDan Hughes-2/28/1998
7294 James, what would you have done if Mark had told you sooner? CBCaroline-2/28/1998
7293 I understand. It was a very dificult situation and it took me a lot of time toMark Rutheiser-2/27/1998
7292 Mark, it was in response to your post on H$H that I first became involved with James T. Millican II-2/27/1998
7291 Thanks, I would like to read it.Mark Rutheiser-2/27/1998
7290 Better still, I have a feature article done on Mr. Rehtorik from a Florida MagaKen Todd-2/27/1998
7289 Excellent idea! Mike thinks he is sitting in the catbird seat. I believe EssaKen Todd-2/27/1998
7288 Yeah, we found out about Mikey being banned after the fact. Funny thing was thcampe-2/27/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):