How high will Microsoft fly? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
How high will Microsoft fly?

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
74651	338	0	MSFT

Emcee: Al Bearse	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
73476	<< perennially hopeful >> I've been a seller of MSFT for severa	David Howe	-	1/23/2003
73475	My apologies, I guess those who are perennially hopeful but most certainly damne	ProDeath	-	1/23/2003
73474	Smanwell, << BTW, thanks for the LOL post of the day: >> Why did y	David Howe	-	1/23/2003
73473	Oh, like you never do this, huh, David? BTW, thanks for the LOL post of the day:	ProDeath	-	1/23/2003
73472	Ron, You are catching on to Jonkai. << Is this your normal debating styl	David Howe	-	1/22/2003
73471	rkral, re:<i>My knowledge of Greek and Roman mythology stinks .</i>	d[-_-]b	-	1/22/2003
73470	Microsoft, others to intro Smart Displays at CeBIT 802.11b support... Mira! B	The Duke of URL©	-	1/22/2003
73469	Post deleted - I was just referring to the moderated thread, too :-)	dybdahl	-	1/22/2003
73468	Jordan, re "<i>the moderated thread</i>". Thanks for info.	rkral	-	1/22/2003
73467	Hi rkral; "Is this your normal debating style? To make a point .. and then	Jordan A. Sheridan	-	1/22/2003
73466	OT .. Eric, thanks for the correction. Medusa, of course. My knowledge of Greek	rkral	-	1/22/2003
73465	OT .. jonkai, are you changing your point? The cause-effect relation in your or	rkral	-	1/22/2003
73464	rkral, re:<i>Those actions have turned a two-headed snake into the head	d[-_-]b	-	1/22/2003
73463	<i> that is the problem.... 2002 points out the problem clearly when $6 b	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73462	<i> and FY2002. So it would seem like your point cannot be proved or disp	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73461	<i> In your 12th point, you say "MSFT, if it paid employees in cash	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73460	You're certainly right on the second count, that is unless you play the shor	ProDeath	-	1/21/2003
73459	OT ... jonkai, I'm starting over. If I can make more direct counterpoints .	rkral	-	1/21/2003
73458	i think the bottom line is that nasdaq has to support this because if it doesn&#	10K a day	-	1/21/2003
73457	<i> He doesn't listen to logic and any figure </i> this coming	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73456	There is a reason why this was invented: Subject 53202 Dybdahl.	dybdahl	-	1/21/2003
73455	<i> So again, do you know the main reason why 2000 was so different from 2	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73454	<i> MSFT doesn't have to buy at today's prices. It doesn't hav	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73453	<i>impact of the option program on net cash flow was negligible for FY2001	jonkai	-	1/21/2003
73452	OT .. Yes, I know .. been down that road once .. both debating, if one can call	rkral	-	1/21/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):