Shaman Pharmaceuticals has been moving on big, relative,

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Shaman Pharmaceuticals has been moving on big, relative,

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
838	4	0	SHMN

Emcee: Michael Greeley	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
738	Are Some Stockholders more "Equal" than Others? Hi, Marcus! I'm	Daniel Shaffer	-	2/18/2000
737	>>I'm buying more.<< Marc, Probably a good move. I suspect an	Edscharp	-	2/18/2000
736	I'm of course disappointed that the stock could not hold its price above $1	JMarcus	-	2/16/2000
735	Under a dollar again! Now THIS is the Shaman I remember! Was hard to recogniz	Don Hess	-	2/16/2000
734	Are any other SHMN/SHPH shareholders here using E-Trade? If so check your accou	Mark McNew	-	2/10/2000
733	Re. Management Indifference to Stockholders' Right-to-Know Thanks, Marc, f	Daniel Shaffer	-	2/9/2000
732	>>Linda would not be getting so many calls if Shaman would simply put up	JMarcus	-	2/8/2000
731	What Investor Relations?...Look at Shaman's Website! Thanks,Marc, for your	Daniel Shaffer	-	2/8/2000
730	Dan, I don't blame you or anyone else for being suspicious and cynical abou	JMarcus	-	2/8/2000
729	Please, enough excuses! "Where's the beef?" "Doing all the	Daniel Shaffer	-	2/8/2000
728	Marc - "Lisa is feeling burned about her past promoting of the company to	Don Hess	-	2/7/2000
727	Ed, I just checked and last year's 10K wasn't filed until April 1, 1999	JMarcus	-	2/7/2000
726	>>Was it at least your understanding that Shaman would definitely be rele	JMarcus	-	2/7/2000
725	Ed, Marc - Beware hyperbole. "Fantastic" sales seen by a company wi	Don Hess	-	2/7/2000
724	Marc, Thank you for the clarification. When I read your original post #692 I a	Edscharp	-	2/7/2000
723	Ed, in a private message to me you asked: >>Maybe I'm a bit confused	JMarcus	-	2/7/2000
722	>>If sales are "fabulous" you would think they would have stron	JMarcus	-	2/7/2000
721	hello rrufff, now that would be some deal if it were true and a significant re	BUDDY MOYNIHAN	-	2/7/2000
720	Don, Your point about Paul Allen is exactly correct. Those who are hyping Sham	Edscharp	-	2/6/2000
719	Reply to thread in general: Be it Paul Allen or anyone else, why is it that hi	Don Hess	-	2/6/2000
718	I thought I read that his shares, which were preferred, were not subject to the	rrufff	-	2/4/2000
717	rruff, unless paul allen put in more money, he owns the same % now as he did p	BUDDY MOYNIHAN	-	2/4/2000
716	I'm looking at this as a possible turn around. The PR right before indicat	rrufff	-	2/4/2000
715	Alexis, just to supplement Ed's answer to your question: each share of your	JMarcus	-	2/4/2000
714	Well, at least that's good news. Maybe the price will go up :) Big Kahun	Big Kahuna	-	2/4/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):