SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7395 Bilberry, I find myself wishing that JMAR was running with this crowd... biz.Lee Fredrickson-2/4/1999
7394 I recall a very bullish MH Meyerson report on JMAR awhile back. With MHMY now Ginko-2/4/1999
7393 Semi-equipment co. news: biz.yahoo.comStarlight-2/4/1999
7392 I agree with your analysis Richard. A $7 to 8 million quarter would be positivBilberry-2/3/1999
7391 Re: Revenue Is that a trick question? I don't think you can separate revenRichaaard-2/3/1999
7390 Richard, how much in revenue do we need in the 4th quarter to beat out 1997 revBilberry-2/3/1999
7389 It looked like these guys (OPC) were getting established in disk inspection aroRichaaard-2/2/1999
7388 Sure, we are still friends..actually thanks for pointing out it was a pay for sCandle stick-2/2/1999
7387 Gooch, I have not talked to Dr. Martinez since October . On JMAR's third CASHSWISS-2/2/1999
7386 Sorry Candle_stick- I apologize for the aggressive tone in my post- I was afraAnaxagoras-2/2/1999
7385 All I said was it was an excellent site to gather hard numbers and facts about Candle stick-2/2/1999
7384 With all due respect, that was one of the most amateurish reports I've seenAnaxagoras-2/2/1999
7383 Richard, there are many competitors in the marketplace. Is this product betterBilberry-2/2/1999
7382 Follow up: QC Optics (OPC) does make a hard drive inspection unit. It looks liRichaaard-2/2/1999
7381 Bowser Warrant Register just named a company called QC Optics to their 10 best Richaaard-2/2/1999
7380 One should not assume that because DARPA is paying 13 mil for something that itRichaaard-2/2/1999
7379 The most comprehensive analysis of JMAR I have ever seen can be found here periCandle stick-2/2/1999
7378 JMAR gets two new PR firms? Note on Yahoo claims this: post.messages.yahoo.coBilberry-2/2/1999
7377 <<Martinez is still super bullish on XRL and has said the same about the Ginko-2/2/1999
7376 Don't forget that Sematech judged XRL on synchtrotron only! With point souBilberry-2/2/1999
7375 I think we have an answer now as to why JMAR's stock has not been doing so Starlight-2/2/1999
7374 Things do not look so good for XRL. IBM is even getting going with an e-beam ptimwa-2/2/1999
7373 How dare you voice your opinion! <g> M Mesaba-2/2/1999
7372 My opinion it is you who has been beaned - really believe you are living in themichael b greenberg-2/1/1999
7371 It looks like someone bailed out the stock at the end of the day. Could we be bRichaaard-2/1/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News