SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7469World's fastest semiconductor circuits From Yahoo board: Another advance frRobert Scott Diver-2/25/2002
7468American Express, IBM Ink $4 Billion Deal siliconinvestor.comRobert Scott Diver-2/25/2002
7467AH: Thanks. As I thought most of this is hype.JFDJohn F. Dowd-2/25/2002
7466Charles, let me take this discussion as an opportunity to provide some pricing mArrow Hd.-2/25/2002
7465Hi John, sorry for the delay but was away for a few days and missed all the reneArrow Hd.-2/25/2002
7464"of actual value?" Nope.Scott Bergquist-2/24/2002
7463That article came out longer than I expected. I pasted it from a file I moved tScott Bergquist-2/24/2002
7462Regatta being "sold out" is pretty meaningless without some indicationCharles Tutt-2/24/2002
7461Someone of your obvious brilliance should be able to figure it out. Perhaps you Robert Scott Diver-2/24/2002
7460Scott: I don't respond to cut and paste posts of such length and particularlJohn F. Dowd-2/24/2002
7459Scott, "it's" is a contraction meaning "it is" ...WhatScott Bergquist-2/24/2002
7458No one seems to remember the analysts applauding IBM for promising to avoid repoRobert Scott Diver-2/24/2002
7457HW gross profit margin was 26.3% ibm.com Regatta sold out ibm.com Can't immRobert Scott Diver-2/24/2002
7456I read the Feb 19th article in the WSJ re the New York Times article on IBM. InScott Bergquist-2/24/2002
7455Charles, IBM has used this technique before according to the Motley Fool FOOL OJust_Observing-2/23/2002
7454My understanding (which is admittedly limited) is that the ploy they used is allCharles Tutt-2/23/2002
7453I haven't seen any disclosure by IBM of whether they made or lost money on tCharles Tutt-2/23/2002
7452msft already is complaininghdl-2/23/2002
7451Another perspective could be "SUNW loses money and market share, but this iRobert Scott Diver-2/23/2002
7450Enron did almost all (I say that "almost" because, hell, I didn't Scott Bergquist-2/23/2002
7449CT:No they did not. Concealing off the books debt is not iaw any set of rules. JJohn F. Dowd-2/23/2002
7448Didn't Enron do its reporting according to GAAP? Charles Tutt (TM)Charles Tutt-2/23/2002
7447Another perspective would be "Sun Retains Number One Position in Unix 'Charles Tutt-2/23/2002
7446"IBM surged in server market share in 2001, gaining at the expense of Sun MRobert Scott Diver-2/23/2002
7445AH: Can you 'splain to me what all the uproar is about IBM -JDSU deal. Was aJohn F. Dowd-2/23/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News