SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
747 bloedman, Thanks! You clarified the point I was trying stumblingly to enunciatDouglas V. Fant-7/24/1997
746 JDN, Both NANO and SMTL are tracking similar patterns. Both stocks cleared recDouglas V. Fant-7/24/1997
745 **OT** Doug, I found the thread. Thank you!! E E. Graphs-7/23/1997
744 (Off Topic) EG, Yes! Put AFLX into the search engine at the bottom of the pageDouglas V. Fant-7/23/1997
743 Doug, You are the first poster I've seen mention AFLX. Is there a thread? E. Graphs-7/23/1997
742 I'm pretty sure that NANO is considered front-end as their equipment is usebloedman-7/23/1997
741 Dear Doug and All: Well, I bought in to the NANO story yesterday, I was the laJDN-7/23/1997
740 tom, Thanks- I'm lucky to be friends with Joe Dancy, and to learn much froDouglas V. Fant-7/23/1997
739 doug - this may appear to be flattery, but i've followed ur posts and have tom pope-7/23/1997
738 milton, One more piece of good news. The Test Sector BTB came in at 1.32 to 1.Douglas V. Fant-7/23/1997
737 tom, Small cap tech stocks are "hairy" but profitable, if held for aDouglas V. Fant-7/23/1997
736 >I'd love to see NANO priced liked KLAC but you're >comparing a 1Wade-7/22/1997
735 Dan, >I'd love to see NANO priced liked KLAC but you're >compariWade-7/22/1997
734 <i> Let us take a look at NANO and KLAC side-by-side from different Dan McNeese-7/22/1997
733 Hi Dan, Let us take a look at NANO and KLAC side-by-side from different anglesWade-7/22/1997
732 Doug F. I just got your note. Thanks. I've been up at the lakes away fmilton-7/22/1997
731 <i>Please do your best to sell NANO to a major by explaining how the stocDan McNeese-7/22/1997
730 Dia and All, Since we all think NANO is going to grow continuouely, therefore,Wade-7/22/1997
729 Peter, Thanks for your NANO insight, I strongly support your assessment that Ndia oko-7/21/1997
728 fear not - i wasn't thinking of day trading. i was trying to comment on thetom pope-7/20/1997
727 Tom, Best not to try and day trade this stock! What we are camping on, is an uDouglas V. Fant-7/19/1997
726 doug - have you ever seen a daily chart quite as weird as nano's? i mean, ttom pope-7/18/1997
725 milton, Nice run on NANO, eh? Since NANO has broken out higher than its previoDouglas V. Fant-7/18/1997
724 I feel sorry for those who sold today at 8. I hope though that they are those dan serachitopol-7/18/1997
723 Carlson, NANO belongs to the semi equipment sector, the hottest in the market. dan serachitopol-7/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):