SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7474 wayne nikituk wrote: "Now the real numbers are in....and this doggie is gDavid Shie-3/10/1998
7473 I was shot down here a few months for claiming this stock will soon see $10--okwayne nikituk-3/9/1998
7472 RE: Upgardes/Downgrades - I think those of us holding the stock have to worry Myron Z.-3/9/1998
7471 Off topic: Wash sale FYI: To: +Jeff Jordan (729 ) From: +James Unterburger SuRealMuLan-3/9/1998
7470 I don't suppose that Greenberg says when the selling occurred? Or how many Sam-3/9/1998
7469 Thanks. Bill. I think I made a wise move to sell this dog around $26. Of courseRealMuLan-3/9/1998
7468 The Greenberg states that quantum insiders are selling more this year than lastBill Lin-3/9/1998
7467 I can see another warning from QNTM is on the way. Those analysts always know sRealMuLan-3/9/1998
7466 dont you hate these shades of grey these analysts create?? Its no longer a &quSamuraiSam-3/9/1998
7465 Bear Sterns downgrade: biz.yahoo.comRFF-3/9/1998
7464 Technically, things could be just about to turn. Still concerned with some of James L Wood-3/9/1998
7463 <<By the by, I wish we would hear from some of the folks who used to pZ Analyzer-3/9/1998
7462 Excerpt from this week's Barron's. The writer is Alan Abelson who is BlackDog777-3/8/1998
7461 If Compaq starts a price war to clear the channel they will certainly move moreDaniel Liberty-3/8/1998
7460 money man, ><i>I guess my prediction of SEG being higher than QNTM by Gottfried-3/7/1998
7459 I guess my prediction of SEG being higher than QNTM by the end of the year camemoney man-3/7/1998
7458 Can anybody verify whether QNTM tape drive business is doing poorly? I'mmoose-3/7/1998
7457 Great post, John. It is clearly evident that there has been a drastic drop offJOE 6PACK-3/7/1998
7456 Does anyone see any similarities between the disc drive industry that collapsedJohn Carson-3/6/1998
7455 To All: Big volume after hours, about 100,000 shares traded at 22 1/8. Any idDavid Su-3/6/1998
7454 To ALL: this is funny...now MOT is expecting a weak Qtr...and QNTM might John Patterson-3/5/1998
7453 Thanks for that reference. Here are some comments from their last QTR: <b&gRFF-3/5/1998
7452 All, The guilty sentence in H.Greenberg's thestreet.com column began: &qutyro-3/5/1998
7451 RFF, I just want to confirm what you posted IS on street.com at thestreet.com Gottfried-3/5/1998
7450 Hi Alan, It is based partly perhaps on wishful thinking; partly from Z, who saiSam-3/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News