SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Irvine Sensors
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1673 36 0 IRSN
Emcee:  Robert Florin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
748 Robet, i think i might be inclined to somewhat agree with you (Arghhhh). But tFredman-4/14/1998
747 Irvine Sensors' ImageK device I've been in this stock for a month and Ryan Yu-4/14/1998
746 Robet, I never said dilution never hurt. Those are your words. What I did say wgreenspirit-4/14/1998
745 I would also respond using another example. If IRSN had 6-8m shares, a 1/2m shaRobet Butkus-4/14/1998
744 Yes....we shall see. Dilution is still hurtful...... I know it is hard for yoRobet Butkus-4/14/1998
743 C'mon Robet, Irvine is not a penny stock, and using your simplistic approacgreenspirit-4/14/1998
742 Regardless of what others might think, dilution..especially in a penny stock...Robet Butkus-4/14/1998
741 Today has some promise..One thing I have noticed about IRSN is the price usuallKEVIN BERGER-4/14/1998
740 Greetings- I'm not worried about any potential dilution at this pointmig driver-4/14/1998
739 Steven, great example NCTI is less than $1 with 132 million shares. Talk aboFranW-4/14/1998
738 Look at what happened to NCTI in Dec 97.Steven-4/13/1998
737 IRSN on the cover of OCR ?? geez, market should open 'up' on monday fFredman-4/12/1998
736 <i> << In order for 'regular' film to be gone in 5 years, DJoseph Chiu-4/12/1998
735 KODAK is their own worst enemy. I am in the Photo Profession on a limited basiFredman-4/12/1998
734 In order for 'regular' film to be gone in 5 years, Digital Imaging is RFredman-4/12/1998
733 <<Are we talking 10-1, 5-1, 3-1, 2-1 odds, or what?>> While we waiKevin G. O'Neill-4/11/1998
732 At the high risk of sounding shallow and stupid----But... Doesn't IRSN realarry ascherman-4/11/1998
731 Thanks, Lynn, for the thorough explanation of the S-3/A issues, and for going tKevin G. O'Neill-4/11/1998
730 Thanks Ed. I've asked a long-time Kodak marketing friend to take a look atKevin G. O'Neill-4/11/1998
729 The run due to market makers? It is unbelievable to think the MM's are maniRobet Butkus-4/11/1998
728 Ed, it seems to me Kodak would be a fool to ignore this technology and let it sgreenspirit-4/11/1998
727 Kevin: You ask if Irvine can protect their EFS-1 from other Big Guys.... At thEd Newman-4/11/1998
726 Never, I hope! I called Lynn O'Mara and she informed me that the S-3/A in Lynn Peters-4/11/1998
725 So when do I get to buy mine for $1? THCForYourEyesOnly-4/10/1998
724 I still don't see how this is a 6 mil overhang currently. Maybe 3.9 plus cKevin G. O'Neill-4/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News