SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
250 6 0
Emcee:  Done, gone. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
75 You guys might find this interesting; imagen.net Adrian du Plessis posts on themarcos-9/6/1997
74 Gustave, yes I agree the con/rumours in the market have not come about just becBill Ulrich-9/6/1997
73 I get everything! As a Nasdaq fan living in Brussels, I can tell you that IGUSTAVE JAEGER-9/6/1997
72 Jens, some additional links which might help you in a more specific manner: teBill Ulrich-9/6/1997
71 HI Bill I did get into the link all right - but found nothing of the THING theMr. Jens Tingleff-9/6/1997
70 ALERT!ALERT! INSIDER INFORMATION HOUSE OF FABRICS TO BAIL OUT INTEL FROM BANKRKEN MANNING-9/6/1997
69 Jens, the link Scrapps was trying to get you to is also available here: nasdaqBill Ulrich-9/6/1997
68 Scrapps, here's a precise case in point where they are clearly not headed iBill Ulrich-9/6/1997
67 Scrapps - Nothing there - even so The "contact Nasdaq" button does noMr. Jens Tingleff-9/6/1997
66 Jens check here...... 206.99.246.6Scrapps-9/6/1997
65 <i>"Well Scrapps, you forgot impotence..."</i> Oh I do tScrapps-9/6/1997
64 HI John You are right - And yet another angle to news television CNBC CNN a.s.Mr. Jens Tingleff-9/6/1997
63 Jens, Sorry, no idea how to help you. Dobrou noc. Bounced CzechDone, gone.-9/6/1997
62 Dear Michal - Dobreden In steadt of reading all the posts on this rapidly groMr. Jens Tingleff-9/6/1997
61 <i>"Who made NASDAQ the Supreme Court of Internet discussion? What gScrapps-9/6/1997
60 You are joking, right? The "nasdaq has a responsibility to..." people-----------9/6/1997
59 Well Scrapps, you forgot impotence... But yes, if they're so bothered abouBill Ulrich-9/6/1997
58 Are you saying Information & Education could help prevent these hypsters frScrapps-9/6/1997
57 Jeff, >> No, it's not the use of the software that worries me, it&#Done, gone.-9/6/1997
56 Jeff, in my opinion, this is all a tempest in a teapot. They're getting a 1jhild-9/6/1997
55 I think the NASDAQ should focus on watching their 4000 companies traded on the Paul M.-9/6/1997
54 Nasdaq should do something about TV rumors, I lost money last fall buying up evBlue-9/6/1997
53 Correction Bill, it is not the SEC that is implementing the NazNet U2, it is thBill Ulrich-9/6/1997
52 IMO, NASDAQ has a fiduciary responsibility to its customers to protect the inteJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/5/1997
51 Oak, sorry you lost on SEXI...would agree with you that this should be stopped.Bill Ulrich-9/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):