SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
TA- Advanced GET
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1551 44 0
Emcee:  Richard Estes Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
751 Bruce, thanks for reply. I wish I were able to articulate this "who'sAlton Stephens-11/24/1997
750 Bruce-thanks for your 2c. I welcome it.. Bear with me for a moment---you feel Gary Burton-11/24/1997
749 This is one of those ranging markets where only the nimble will be making a proBruce A. Bowman-11/24/1997
748 I recall you mentioning that before. I just looked at it again and see what yoBruce A. Bowman-11/24/1997
747 After august, I moved more short term. Playing the false breakouts. It is not bRichard Estes-11/24/1997
746 The "who's in control" analysis makes sense to me. For example, Bruce A. Bowman-11/24/1997
745 I have always thought a MACD(13,34,89) comes close. But if it is based on the rRichard Estes-11/24/1997
744 Al, Everyone- I just noticed the corelation between the EWO relative to its stBruce A. Bowman-11/24/1997
743 I see no value in plotting an indicator like an oscillator that's fixed in Bruce A. Bowman-11/24/1997
742 If you find more visual effect from it, use it. On a regular MACD, I only use aRichard Estes-11/24/1997
741 Richard- GET is based in part on tracking momentum peaks in its osc to determinGary Burton-11/24/1997
740 Alton, Thank you for your reply. I did not go to the seminar so "whoRoss-11/23/1997
739 Gary, have you brought this to TTI attention? I would if I understood it, but Alton Stephens-11/23/1997
738 FOR ROSS- Ross, I looked at your chart and think we are not talking off the samAlton Stephens-11/23/1997
737 Ross, I think I focused on the stochastics part of your question when what you Alton Stephens-11/23/1997
736 Log when applied to price wakes the non-thinker up to "percents count"Richard Estes-11/23/1997
735 Hi Peter, thanks for your reply. Actually, I wasn't aware that I could righGary Burton-11/23/1997
734 Ross, I would not suggest that someone rely on anything that hadn't proved Alton Stephens-11/23/1997
733 Hello Gary, I would like to comment on your observation on the scale differencPeter Filiberto-11/22/1997
732 Alton, A couple of things you said are interesting to me. First you mention thRoss-11/22/1997
731 Saturday Night musings----In the real world most stocks go up in an ABC and dowGary Burton-11/22/1997
730 Bruce, thanks! I will fix address. Here is an email I sent to Richard a couplAlton Stephens-11/22/1997
729 Hi Al- I think there are so changes going on as they upgrade SI. I've seBruce A. Bowman-11/22/1997
728 Jan, thanks. I got it straightened out. My setup was screwy; i still don'Alton Stephens-11/22/1997
727 Don't apologize, Al... your doing <b>us</b> the favor!! I apprBruce A. Bowman-11/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News