SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7519Looked at it.. the charts source is IBM but lets look further.. 9 years 1992 &gj g cordes-3/11/2002
7518He Loves to Win. At IBM, He Did. nytimes.com Recommend looking at Graphic: TheRobert Scott Diver-3/11/2002
7517I have no way of know that. It may be in the upcoming 10K.j g cordes-3/10/2002
7516If debt is rising to finance customer purchases, but revenue is stagnant, does tCharles Tutt-3/10/2002
7515Re "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at absolute earnings andj g cordes-3/10/2002
7514Lets be clear on this discussion of IBM's price argument. The central questij g cordes-3/10/2002
7513IBM inches out Sun in Unix server lead, study says famulus.msnbc.com One way IBMRobert Scott Diver-3/10/2002
7512Robert, Don't know enough about IBM's business to speculate as to whetheJacques Newey-3/10/2002
7511While reading the article on IBMwhich you posted from 2000 in 2002, I continue tRobert Scott Diver-3/9/2002
7510IMO, EPS only matters w/ respect to share price. I don't care if it grow bysmchan-3/9/2002
7509"Hocus-Pocus: How IBM Grew 27% a Year LEAD STORY-DATELINE: Fortune.com, Moj g cordes-3/9/2002
7508The market is trading at the highest earnings multiples in history and the qualiMike M2-3/9/2002
7507Enron exists, therefore IBM is suspect? Does this reasoning apply to every securRobert Scott Diver-3/9/2002
7506S&P credit rating LOL. The credit rating agencies were really on the ball wiMike M2-3/9/2002
7505"Debt is debt"? No one can argue with that. What is your point? The fRobert Scott Diver-3/9/2002
7504I've heard that argument quite a few times, but debt is debt. It still has Charles Tutt-3/9/2002
7503As a very simple example to support Scott's point of view: Some background:Seeker2007-3/8/2002
7502Joan: I think you are mixing the debt IBM has to finance the IBM Credit Corp witHsien W. Chang-3/8/2002
7501>Which IBM earnings aren't real? By not real, I mean "don't >Jonathan Edwards-3/8/2002
7500Your question has nothing to do with what I posted to you! But your question isj g cordes-3/8/2002
7499Which IBM earnings aren't real? By not real, I mean "don't exist&quRobert Scott Diver-3/8/2002
7498Joan, Just much has debt "exploded" in the past few years? It seems DavesM-3/8/2002
7497Robert, >>You seem to imply that investing in IBM, whose PE is about 23, iJoan Osland Graffius-3/8/2002
7496RS.. I won't reply for Jacques, but I believe the rant on IBM is that its grj g cordes-3/8/2002
7495I don't know if it was posted before... but IBM takes the lead from SUN in UDavesM-3/8/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News