Microphonics Inc. (mrps) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
Microphonics Inc. (mrps)

An SI Board Since March 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
8189	18	0	MRPS

Emcee: matthew lamberson	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
7539	From RB. Enjoy. By: DollarSign Reply To: None Saturday, 7 Aug 1999 at 12:07	saigon69	-	8/7/1999
7538	Doesn't seem to help. (-6 1/4% more) Ugh! Keep the faith, I know! With	Chisy	-	8/6/1999
7537	The income statement is now on the MRPS website.	Mitch	-	8/6/1999
7536	This thread has always been about discussions not debate, about opinions not na	mgland	-	8/6/1999
7535	We know who Mitch is. We also know you are over here to cause the same trouble	Robert Bolton	-	8/6/1999
7534	How about if I just post the facts about what has happened with this company si	saigon69	-	8/6/1999
7533	saijon66 nobody on this thread is going to sell their shares just because of y	HEMIGUY	-	8/6/1999
7532	ragingbull.com Here is the real Mitch, known as cats5 on th RB thread. Just th	saigon69	-	8/6/1999
7531	Well stated. But SSA just like the rest of us are real people. I personally l	mgland	-	8/5/1999
7530	Hey Guys cool your heels. Vic has brought up some good points. I also felt tha	Zeus549	-	8/5/1999
7529	It was my understanding that most of the contracts were not for one single deli	Mark McNew	-	8/5/1999
7528	RE the mention of Goodyear in the PR. To: Mike Parsons (6343 ) From: Jon Sco	Mitch	-	8/5/1999
7527	Am I missing something? Don't the announced earnings seem awfully low, esp	Chisy	-	8/5/1999
7526	Boy, I wish I had said that...	fatheroz	-	8/5/1999
7525	Amen to that, Mark! Thanks for articulating what MANY feel! Catherine	catherineiw	-	8/5/1999
7524	Making new people aware that your motives are questionable is not a personal at	Mark McNew	-	8/5/1999
7523	Vic, OT: You seem to be slinging the term "personal attacks" pretty	Robert Lowers	-	8/5/1999
7522	In my opinion, personal attacks on individual posters is not becoming. What var	learnstocks	-	8/5/1999
7521	You, sir, do not know my name. I would appreciate it greatly if you would not	learnstocks	-	8/5/1999
7520	Vic, You said SSA's post "seems to be trying to promote the upward po	Robert Lowers	-	8/5/1999
7519	I would suggest you file a complaint with the SEC. Be sure to sign your correct	Mitch	-	8/5/1999
7518	This post by SSA may be crossing the line of what should be acceptable from a P	learnstocks	-	8/5/1999
7517	Bob, good post. For the most part this is accurate. With regard to item 6, con	learnstocks	-	8/5/1999
7516	Could you boys do us a favor and stop posting that ridiculous nonsense. IMO, y	saigon69	-	8/5/1999
7515	Who's BK? I know you as cats5, richardmitchell, and richardnoggin on the R	saigon69	-	8/5/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):