SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7569You could also say, as IBM (and other large stocks) go, so goes the market. FromRobert Scott Diver-4/3/2002
7568RSD, just to amplify what I am trying to say, it is that stocks such as MSFT, GEScott Bergquist-4/2/2002
7567Most stock have daily moves with a correlation to the markets. My point is that Robert Scott Diver-4/2/2002
7566RSD - Over the five-year period, lockstep up/down days remain 70%, although theMichael Bakunin-4/2/2002
7565Wow, a correlation of 0.62 using data going back to 1962. This certainly trumps Robert Scott Diver-4/2/2002
7564RSD - Let's measure it. There are a variety of ways to quantify the statemMichael Bakunin-4/2/2002
7563This chart might indicate that your statement that "IBM moves according to Robert Scott Diver-4/2/2002
7562Scott, regardless of your reposting of these bits of news, it won't encouragScott Bergquist-4/1/2002
7561IBM Named Number One Worldwide ASIC Supplier For Third Year IBM also was the onlRobert Scott Diver-4/1/2002
7560"Linux on mainframe systems? Don't laugh. Dave Ennen isn't. The tecRobert Scott Diver-3/29/2002
7559Since the bears are out posting old news (although some of the articles had currRobert Scott Diver-3/29/2002
7558Note vested interest of news purveyor. Here is the NYT's review of his bookMichael Bakunin-3/28/2002
7557Direct IBM involvement in Holocaust revealed jpost.comJ. P.-3/28/2002
7556Charles, perhaps it's because the SEC only goes after teenagers who use tactMike M2-3/28/2002
7555I'm surprised IBM is up in light of that news. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-3/28/2002
7554A, SEC & IBM 216.46.231.211 mikeMike M2-3/28/2002
7553Well, compared to you guys, I'm a young buck, though I will admit to writingsmchan-3/27/2002
7552I wired boards on the old accounting machines and programmed 14XX computers fromRobert Scott Diver-3/27/2002
7551Web, since there was nothing from the 70s you are still young. I started in theArrow Hd.-3/27/2002
7550**OT- Back in the day... I built a few DG Eclipse S/140s from the boards up- quiWebDrone-3/27/2002
7549Your 80% market share "rule" seems obvious upon reflection. The only mRobert Scott Diver-3/27/2002
7548This is just a general response to the discussion on market share and is somewhaArrow Hd.-3/27/2002
7547Web, I agree. Remember the 80s when "DEC had it all". With DG right bArrow Hd.-3/27/2002
7546RSD - If you have any overview statistics, marginal indicators, URLs or the liMichael Bakunin-3/26/2002
7545IMHO IBM is gaining market share in many key areas. In other areas IBM has annouRobert Scott Diver-3/26/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):