SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7619Agreed-- csco was caught up in their own and the mkt hype.Captain Jack-4/11/2002
7618I continue holding my long-held position. Don't really know what to do with David-4/11/2002
7617I certainly agree there will be ceilings over-hanging any upward bias and I am sArrow Hd.-4/11/2002
7616With 7+ billion shares in the float after a flurry of split after split, who knosmchan-4/11/2002
7615Substitute "Cisco" for IBM, and you make the same arguments (to my POVScott Bergquist-4/11/2002
7614the reporter that went after IBM is negligent,,, very unprofessional,,, less smaCaptain Jack-4/11/2002
7613I think the macro issue for IBM is revenue growth. With it comes better marginsArrow Hd.-4/11/2002
7612Hi Arrow, I was glad to see the SEC drop the IBM investigation. I believe, if IBJules B. Garfunkel-4/11/2002
7611Hi Jules, in today's environment I don't think a scorned analyst has theArrow Hd.-4/11/2002
7610US SEC SAYS HAS ENDED PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY INTO IBM <IBM.N> (Reuters 0Captain Jack-4/11/2002
7609Yes-- back over 87 in AH, SEC dropped investigation tonight. Not going to do mucCaptain Jack-4/11/2002
7608Yes it was--- bought it around 87 then. Sadly, bought it near 87 again,, just evCaptain Jack-4/11/2002
7607Good post Arrow, However, if I my add, IMHO, if analysts find out that they werJules B. Garfunkel-4/11/2002
7606Hi all, I just stopped bye to say hello, and to see if you remember all of my poJules B. Garfunkel-4/11/2002
7605Added a small amount to my long-held position in IBM today.Paul Senior-4/11/2002
7604IBM falls after report of SEC probe marketwatch.com Tide’s out!!!! Let’s all rJacques Newey-4/11/2002
7603If you wish to see a "way back machine" check this out. BTW, I startedehasfjord-4/11/2002
7602Listening to the T reverse split explanation due to the broadband sale I could nArrow Hd.-4/10/2002
7601<i> I did not realize IBM was below 90 in 99.</i> Technically, Ismchan-4/10/2002
7600Niels, very interesting piece, thanks.Arrow Hd.-4/10/2002
7599Sam, thanks for the chart. I did not realize IBM was below 90 in 99. Very inteScott Bergquist-4/10/2002
7598highwaygds.net (A PBS program time ago said the IBM people even went to GK'Niels Larsen-4/10/2002
7597I don't know the answer regarding DOS and CPM. There are folks who come on Arrow Hd.-4/9/2002
7596re:"This article points out one of the 20th century's worst industrial DavesM-4/9/2002
7595Hi Charles, some interesting points but I would say it is more of a hybred situaArrow Hd.-4/9/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News