SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
2000:The Make-or-Break Election
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1013 9 0
Emcee:  c.horn Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
763<b>Woman who questioned Gore now faces IRS inquiry </B> washtimes.carno-8/30/2000
762Ooops. That wasn't your point was it Lazarre? You said that Dems did not gojlallen-8/28/2000
761I'm surprised at you, JLA; you know that for every ragin' cajun, you'lazarre-8/28/2000
760It beats me, too. High tech is in its wild west phase, and should not be showingNeocon-8/28/2000
759I do not understand why anyone interested in technology issues would support theTom Clarke-8/28/2000
758On that idiotic note, I will step out to run an errand. Back in a bit.......Neocon-8/28/2000
757"I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracBill-8/28/2000
756<i>Won't happen, though. Dems don't have the propensity to go for jlallen-8/28/2000
755<i>his criticism of Gore's criticism reminded me of RR during his lastjlallen-8/28/2000
754<i> The beginning post on this thread referred to Scalia and Thomas as thiTimF-8/28/2000
753<i>If you call him a liberal, where does that leave you room to go? </iarno-8/28/2000
752Well,I picked JJ as an example, and didn't really want to discuss him per sWharf Rat-8/28/2000
751<i>but I meant political label. </i> Oh, I see.... <ggg> I&#arno-8/28/2000
750That too,but I meant political label. While we are on the subject, when I waWharf Rat-8/28/2000
749<i>If you call Clinton liberal, then what do you call Jackson?</i> arno-8/28/2000
748The Next President - Part Four: A Gore Foreign Policy Summary The fourth part CIMA-8/28/2000
747The Next President - Part Three: A Bush Foreign Policy 21 August 2000 SummaryCIMA-8/28/2000
746The Next President - Part Two: The Unspoken Issue - The Impact of Globalization CIMA-8/28/2000
745The Next President - Part One: The Elections and Beyond 7 August 2000 Summary CIMA-8/28/2000
7444 MORE years of liberalism? We haven't had any liberalism since Carter was Wharf Rat-8/27/2000
743Yes, I do believe there are voters that will "one issue" vote. My bridPROLIFE-8/27/2000
742Buchanan is not going to get a substantial percentage of the vote from anyone. BNeocon-8/27/2000
741My point...there are a multitude of voters eyeballing this issue as the only isslazarre-8/27/2000
740Just as a matter of curiosity, why would they go to Buchanan? He is pro- life...Neocon-8/27/2000
739seriously, aside from all your hahahaha's, why do you find that difficult tolazarre-8/27/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):