SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Covad Communications - COVD
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10485 112 0 COVD
Emcee:  Mark Duper Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7635Anyone developing a manic depressive disorder yet? ;) Today we went steadily doLiPolymer-4/29/2004
7634Cap your 1.5 predication might happen way sooner the Dec 04. 2.5 looks good our rjk01-4/29/2004
7633Cooked! This stock is sunk!Captain James T. Kirk-4/29/2004
7632Nice walk down on low volume....Buying more here at 2.05. A nice earnings play.Captain James T. Kirk-4/29/2004
7631Confused? Why? The RBOCs are not going to provide a broadband service for T, juCaptain James T. Kirk-4/29/2004
7630So what's the consensus? Good for COVD as they will participate in any agrerrufff-4/29/2004
7629amtdrt.inlumen.comrjk01-4/29/2004
7628OT Of course, we know what we think of ANALysts, esp on this thread. Think Goldrrufff-4/29/2004
7627<i>Where NT has run into <b>short term trouble</b> is with theThe Ox-4/28/2004
7626OT RRUF..this is what I am talking about. I am thinking this way. Message 200Harold S.-4/28/2004
7625OT Michael, this is my last, I hope, NT post but seriously I wouldn't want trrufff-4/28/2004
7624OK just remember COVD is at 2.11 and NT is at 4. I'm probably giving you anrrufff-4/28/2004
7623Fair enough. I'll come back here next year and we can compare notes. My thThe Ox-4/28/2004
7622OT - I'm saying there are a heckova lot better longs than waiting for monthsrrufff-4/28/2004
7621OT NT -Agreed but more dilution for shareholders. Already 4 bilion shares and rirrufff-4/28/2004
7620OT: Stock was over $8.00 not too long ago.Captain James T. Kirk-4/28/2004
7619OT I disagree with your characterization of NT. First, it is NOT even close to The Ox-4/28/2004
7618I don't think the Canadian government will allow NT to go under. :)LiPolymer-4/28/2004
7617OT - have you followed NT? They were very close to chapter 11. Do you know how rrufff-4/28/2004
7616OT- WHY?>??? You have been preaching revenue revenue revenue...take a look aHarold S.-4/28/2004
7615OT - why? bloated capital structure, history of corporate management who wasted rrufff-4/28/2004
7614<OFF TOPIC> NORTEL!! Buy with both fists!!! I loaded the boat at $3.89 tHarold S.-4/28/2004
7613Competitive Telcos Say Talks With Bells Not Working Dow Jones, Tuesday, AprVic Breck-4/28/2004
7612Sell pressure? Got my "free" shares of Covad today. Apparently they haCaptain James T. Kirk-4/27/2004
7611Ok, I'll Scatch it. As soon as they decide to release the earnings date we Harold S.-4/27/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News